SMT. BORAMMA v. REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS
WP/3922/2025 · 2025-07-18
E S Indiresh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75940 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75940 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26817 WP No. 3922 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.3922 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1. SMT. BORAMMA W/O LATE PRAHALADAYYA, AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS, R/AT BEERAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, YADIYURU HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 571124. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATH S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1. REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS BENGALURU DIVISION, K R CIRCLE, BENGALURU - 560001. 2. TECHNICAL ASSISTANT TO THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND EX-OFFICIO OF DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS, DC OFFICE TUMAKUR DISTRICT, TUMKUR - 572101. 3. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS KUNIGAL TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, KUNIGAL, KUNIGAL - 572130. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26817 WP No. 3922 of 2025
4. TAHSILDAR KUNIGAL TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, KUNIGAL - 572130. 5. REVENUE INSPECTOR, KUNIGAL TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, YADIYUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL - 572130. 6. SURVEY OFFICER SURVEY DEPARTMENT, KUNIGAL TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, YADIYUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL - 572130. 7. SHAHIDHA S/O SYED AMIR, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/AT BEERAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, YADIYUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, KUNIGAL - 572130. 8. B A SOWBHAGYA W/O B S GANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT NO.65, MUNISWAMAPPA LAYOUT, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI, NAGASANDRA POST, BENGALURU - 560073. 9. B H SAVITHRAMMA W/O N A GANGADHARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT NO. 257, 1ST MAIN ROAD, BASAVAESHWARANAGARA POST NEAR DEENA SEVA HIGH SCHOOL, KAMALANAGARA BENGALURU - 560079. - 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26817 WP No. 3922 of 2025
10. SHANTHAMMA W/O LATE MADHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT BEERAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, YADIYUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK KUNIGAL - 572130. 11. KEMPAMMA W/O LATE KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT NO. 693, 5TH MAIN ROAD, 2ND CROSS, KAMALANAGAR BANGALORE - 560079. 12. GOWRAMMA W/O D L NARASIMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT BEERAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, YADIYUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, KUNIGAL - 572130. 13. N. RAVICHANDRAN S/O LATE NANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT BEERAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, YADIYUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, KUNIGAL - 572130. 14. G N BOREGOWDA S/O LATE NARASIMHAYYA ALIAS THAMMAYYA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT BEERAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, YADIYUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, KUNIGAL - 572130. 15. PREMA W/O BOREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26817 WP No. 3922 of 2025
R/AT BEERAGANAHALLI VILLAGE, YADIYUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK, KUNIGAL - 572130. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.
NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R6)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 06/07/2024 PASSED BY THE R1, REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS IN REVISION PETITION NO. PRA.BHOO.JAM.NI.RIVISION(THU).23/2023-24 VIDE ANNX-A; QUASH THE ORDER DATED 23/08/2021 PASSED BY THE R2 IN APPEAL NO. BHOO.U.NI.APPEAL.187/2019-20, VIDE ANNEXURE-B; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents.
2. In this writ petition, petitioner is assailing the order dated 06.07.2024 (Annexure-A) passed by respondent No.1 and the
order dated 23.08.2021 (Annexure-B) passed by respondent No.2, as well as sought for quashing the phody / sketch vide Annexure-D.
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26817 WP No. 3922 of 2025
3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and carefully examined the finding recorded by respondent No.1 in the impugned order dated 06.07.2024.
4. Having taken note of the submissions made by the
learned counsel appearing for the parties, the respondent - authorities have arrived at a conclusion that there is discrepancy in so far as the measurement mentioned in the registered Sale Deed dated 21.11.2007 and accordingly, hissa phody has been made including 12 ft. road in Sy.No.27/2A2 and in that view of the matter, taking into consideration the illegality committed while conducting hissa and phody, the respondent - authorities have remanded the matter to respondent No.3 to survey the land afresh and to consider the respective measurement to be entered in the revenue records.
5. In that view of the matter, this Court has no jurisdiction to interfere in the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Consequently, I.A.1/2025 also stands dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22