- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:2574 RP No. 100132 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI REVIEW PETITION NO. 100132 OF 2022 IN MFA NO.100286/2016 (LAC) BETWEEN: KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAM LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, MLBCC DIV.NO.2, NAVILUTEERTH, TAL: SAUNDATTI, DIST: BELAGAUM-551126. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.S.M.TONNE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER MALAPRABHA PROJECT-III, SECTOR NO.60, NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOT-587103. 2. SRI.ISHWARAPPA BASAPPA TOTAGER AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: HOOLI, TAL: SAUNDATTI, DIST: BELAGAVI-591126. …RESPONDENTS THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED U/O 47 RULE 1 R/W SEC. 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO, CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN LAC NO. 64/2011 ON THE FILE OF LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE SAUNDATTI; CALL FOR THE RECORDS OF MFA NO.100286/2016 DISPOSED ON 26.02.2016 BY THIS HON’BLE COURT FROM THE REGISTRY; ALLOW THE REVIEW AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT PASSED IN MAF NO.100286/2016 DISPOSED ON 26.02.2016 CORRECT THE SAME BY REFIXING THE MARKET VALUE AT RS. 3,00,000/- PER ACRE INSTEAD OF RS.5,08,000/- PER ACRE. THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: VIJAYALAKSHMI M KANKUPPI Digitally signed by VIJAYALAKSHMI M KANKUPPI Date: 2024.02.13 10:48:31 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:2574 RP No. 100132 of 2022 ORDER Though this review petition was filed on 18.11.2022, the matter was listed before the Court on 23.06.2023. At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, a week’s time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again, the matter was listed on 13.07.2023. At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, a week’s time was granted. Yet again the matter was listed on 19.01.2024. At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, two weeks time was granted. In spite of granting sufficient opportunity, the petitioner has not complied with the office objections. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the review petition. Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- JUDGE kmv ct: vh