Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75928 (MAD)

KANNIAPPAN v. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEERING

WP/26337/2025 · 2025-07-22

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 26337 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-07-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN WP No. 26337 of 2025 AND WMP NO. 29637 OF 2025 1. KANNIAPPAN S/o.Onbaduram, No.144, B Block, F-2, High Tech Tamil Apartments, Rajaram Street, Mudihchur, Chennai-600 048. Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Superintending Engineering Chennai Edc, South-I, K.K.Nagar, Chennai-600 078. Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent not to proceed with the Enquiry in proceedings Memo No.894/ SE/ CEDC/ S-I/ Adm.O/ Adm.I/ A.2/ F.F.C.8 (b) /2025 dated 15.05.2025 pending disposal in C.C. No.3 of 2020 by the Special Court for Prevention of Corruption Act cases, Chennai and within frame as deem fit and proper by this Court and or pass any other or further order that this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the proper facts and circumstances of the case under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26337 of 2025 For Petitioner(s): Mr.Aravind Subramaniam, Sr.Counsel For M/s.V.Shenaz For Respondent(s): Mr.David Sundar Singh, S.C., For Sole Respondent ***** ORDER Though the petitioner had sought for a writ of Mandamus, restraining the respondent to proceed with the disciplinary proceedings pending disposal of the Criminal case in C.C.No.3 of 2020, the petitioner had restricted his prayer to the extent that he has no grievance to proceed with the disciplinary proceedings and he wants only the stay of disciplinary proceedings till disposal of the criminal case in C.C.No.3 of 2020. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent has also concede to the above submissions. 3. In view of the above submissions of both sides, the respondent is at liberty to proceed with the enquiry proceedings and the petitioner is directed to co-operate with the same. However, the respondent is restrained to pass final orders till the disposal of the criminal case in C.C.No.3 of 2020. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26337 of 2025 4. In the result, this Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above directions. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected WMP is also closed. 22-07-2025 kmi Index:Yes/No Speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The Superintending Engineering Chennai EDC, South-I, K.K.Nagar, Chennai-600 078. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 26337 of 2025 C.KUMARAPPAN J. kmi WP No. 26337 of 2025 AND WMP NO.29637 OF 2025 22-07-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis