Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44798 WP No. 15952 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 15952 OF 2022 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN:
1. SRI. GOPAL T R S/O THIMMANNA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/O B L GOWDANAGARA HIRIYUR TOWN-577598 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KALEEMULLAH SHARIFF, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE RANGE FOREST OFFICER FOREST OFFICE HIRIYUR TOWN-577598 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. 2. THE TAHSILDAR HIRIYUR TOWN-577598 CHITRADURGA DISTRICT. 3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE RURAL POLICE STATION HIRIYUR TOWN-577598. 4. MYAKLOD THIMMANNA S/O MULABAGILA BHOVI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/O THIRUMALANAGAR
Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44798 WP No. 15952 of 2022
HIRIYUR TALUK-577598. 5. KARIYAPPA S/O BHIMA BHOVI AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/O THIRUMALANAGAR HIRIYUR TALUK-577598. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 3 TO CONSIDER THE COMPLAINTS DATED 12.04.2018 PRODUCED AT ANENXURE-D, GIVEN TO RESPONDENT NO.1 DATED 14.03.2018 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E GIVEN TO THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO ACCEPT THE COMPLAINT ANNEXURE-G, DATED 04.05.2022 AND TO TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION BY ISSUING A WRIT OF MANDAMUS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44798 WP No. 15952 of 2022
ORAL ORDER
1. The prayer made by the petitioner in this writ petition is to issue a writ of mandamus to the respondent Nos.1 to 3 to register the complaint against the private respondent Nos.4 and 5 herein. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. Having taken note of the averments made in the complaints at Annexures D, E and G, wherein it is alleged that the neighbouring land owners are interfering with the schedule property of the petitioner, the matter is of civil nature. In that view of the matter, since the matter is of civil nature, I am of the view that, the prayer made in the writ petition cannot be accepted. However, it is open for the petitioner to approach the competent court for redressal of his grievances. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23