Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35198 WP No. 36168 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 36168 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. MOHAN S/O LATE JAGADISH AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS
2.
SRI. SATHISH S/O LATE JAGADISH AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT CHANDAPURA VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT - 562 106. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SATEESHA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, KEMPEGOWDA ROAD, BEHIND KANDDHYA BHAVAN, BANGALORE - 560 009. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35198 WP No. 36168 of 2024
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH SUB-DIVISION, KANDHAYA BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009.
4.
DEPUTY TAHASILDAR, ATTIBELE NADAKACHERI, ANEKAL, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT - 562 106.
5.
SRI. M. SIDDAMPPA, S/O MUNIBEERAPPA, MAJOR,
6.
SRI. M. SHIVAPPA, S/O MUNIBEERAPPA, MAJOR, RESPONDENT NO.5 AND 6 ARE RESIDING AT CHANDRAPURA VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT - 562 106. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V. SESHU, HCGP FOR R1 TO R4)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-CALL FOR THE RECORDS AND ISSUE RIGHT ORDER OF DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF WRIT CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE ORDER DTD 24.09.2024 PASSED BY THE R-2 IN R.P NO. 445/2023 AS ANNX-A IN RESPECT OF LAND MEASURING 1 ACRE 0-11 GUNTAS OF SY NO. 87/1 AND LAND MEASURING 0-4 GUNTAS IN SYNO. 156/2 SITUATED AT CHANDAPURA VILLAGE,
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35198 WP No. 36168 of 2024 ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT TO AWARD COSTS OF THIS PETITION AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER The petitioners and
learned counsel for the petitioners have filed a memo dated 04.09.2025 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition as not pressed.
2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21 CT: BHK