SHRI. ULHAS MAHADEO PATWARDHAN AND ANR v. SHRI. BHALCHANDRA DATTATRAYA APTE AND ORS
CRA/16/2020 · 2025-11-14
Shri Sandeep V Marne
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75911 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75911 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
k 1/2 909 cra 16.20 as.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.16 OF 2020 Ulhas Mahadeo Patwardhan & Anr. ....Applicants V/S Bhalchandra Dattatraya Apte & Ors. ....Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2675 OF 2020 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.16 OF 2020 Ulhas Mahadeo Patwardhan & Anr. ....Applicants V/S Bhalchandra Dattatraya Apte & Ors. ....Respondents _________ None for the Applicants. __________
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATE : 14 NOVEMBER 2025. P.C.:
1. On 10 November 2025, the following order was passed:
“1) None appears for the Applicants. List the Revision Application under the caption ‘for dismissal’ on 14 November 2025.”
2. Today again none has appeared on behalf of the Applicant. It appears that Applicant has no interest in prosecuting the Revision Application. The Civil Revision Application is dismissed for want of prosecution. katkam Page No.
1 of
2
k 2/2 909 cra 16.20 as.doc
3. In view of the disposal of the Civil Revision Application, nothing would be survive in the Interim Application and the same is also disposed of accordingly.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) katkam Page No.
2 of
2
SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Digitally signed by SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Date: 2025.11.15 18:40:59 +0530