Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75906 (PNJ)

REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER FARIDABAD v. M/S LILLIPUT KIDWEAR LIMITED AND ANR

RA-CW/380/2025 · 2025-09-05

Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (104) RA-CW-380-2025 in/and CWP-24398-2014 Date of Decision : September 05, 2025 Central Board of Trustees Employees Provident Fund Organization through Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Faridabad .. Petitioner Versus M/s Liliput Kidswear Limited and another .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Sandeep Goyal, Advocate, for the applicant-petitioner. None for the respondents. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL) RA-CW-380-2025 Present application has been filed for review of the order dated 02.05.2025. Learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner submits that the respondent No.1-Company has not been closed and therefore, the order dated 02.05.2025 be recalled. Keeping in view the averments made in the application, which are duly supported by an affidavit, the application is allowed and the order dated 02.05.2025 is recalled and on the asking of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the main writ petition is taken up for hearing today itself. HARSHA RANI 2025.09.08 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RA-CW-380-2025 in/and 2 CWP-24398-2014 CWP-24398-2014 1. The present writ petition was filed in the year 2014 challenging the order dated 05.06.2014 copy of which has been appended as Annexure P-4 passed by the Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, giving certain benefits to respondent No.1 and even after a period of 11 years, respondent No.1-Company has not been served. 2. Keeping in view the totality of the circumstances, as respondent No.1-Company has not been served, which is the contesting respondent, it is clear that the petitioner is not diligently pursuing the present writ petition. 3. The present petition is disposed of for want of prosecution. September 05, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) harsha JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No HARSHA RANI 2025.09.08 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document