Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75906 (BOM)

SATHYADAS V MANI v. Gupta Jagdish Shankarlal

ALP/88/2025 · 2025-11-28

Shri Sandeep V Marne

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neeta Sawant 910-ALP--88-2025.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLN. FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPEAL (PVT.) NO. 88 OF 2025 Sathyadas V. Mani …..Applicant : Versus : Gupta Jagdish Shankarlal & Anr. ….Respondents Ms. Shweta Kannan with Mr. Murugaseelan Perumal, for the Applicant. for the Applicant. Ms. Shurukh Mohd. Aslam for Respondent No.1. Mr. Vinit A. Kulkarni, APP for State. CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATED : 28 NOVEMBER 2025. P.C : 1) Ms. Kannan, the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant/Appellant, on instructions, seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the Application and the Appeal with liberty to file Appeal under the Proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973/Section 413 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 before the Sessions Court in view of judgment of the Apex Court in Celestium Financial Versus. A. Gnanasekaran Etc.1. 1 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320 _____________________________________________________________________________ PAGE NO. 1 of 2 FRIDAY, 28 NOVEMBER 2025 Neeta Sawant 910-ALP--88-2025.docx 2) Reserving the liberty as prayed for, the Application and Appeal are permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of. 3) If Appeal is filed before the Sessions Court within a period of eight weeks, the Appellant/Applicant shall be entitled to the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963. 4) Registry shall return the original certified copy of the impugned order to the Applicant. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] _____________________________________________________________________________ PAGE NO. 2 of 2 FRIDAY, 28 NOVEMBER 2025 NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Digitally signed by NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Date: 2025.11.28 15:39:37 +0530