- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50260 CRP No. 217 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 217 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. THE MANAGING COMMTTTEE HAZARATH HAMEED SHASH AND HAZARATH MUHIB SHAH DARGAH COMPLEX AND ITS ALLIED INSTITUTIONS NO 1, CUBBONEPT MAIN ROAD BENGALURU - 560 002 REP BY PRESIDENT / SECRETARY …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAKASH TIMMANNA HEBBAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. KARNATAKA WAKFS PROTECTION JOINT ACTION COMMITTEE (R) NO.2, CARIYAPPA BHAVAN RESIDENCY ROAD BENGALURU - 560 025 REP BY GENERAL SECRETARY 2. KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF WAKFS DARUL AUQAFS CUNNIGHAM ROAD BENGALURU - 560 052 REP BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHAMMED TAHIR A., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 SRI. P. USMAN, ADVOCATE FOR R2(NOC)) Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50260 CRP No. 217 of 2022 THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 83(9) OF WAQF ACT R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC AGAINST THE ORDER THE ORDER DATED 27.04.2022 PASSED IN APPL.No.12/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE KARNATAKA WAQF TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU DIVISION, BENGALURU, ALLOWING THE APPLICATION FILED UNDER SECTION 83(2) OF THE WAQF ACT 1995. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 has filed a memo which reads as under: "The Respondent No.1 humbly submits as follows: That in the above Petition, the term of the Petitioner Managing Committee is expired on 04-07-2022 as such, nothing survives in this Petition. Hence, the Respondent No.1 prays this Hon'ble Court may dismiss the above Petition, with direction to Respondent No.2 hereby to hold election to the Managing Committee of the Wakf Institution, as per the order passed by the Karnataka Wakf Tribunal in Application No.12/2019, in the interest of Justice and Equity." - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50260 CRP No. 217 of 2022 2. Contents of the said memo is brought to the notice of Sri. P.T. Hebbar. 3. Sri. P.T. Hebbar would submit that no doubt the present petition has rendered infructuous, but rights of the petitioners be protected in the future proceedings. 4. Sri. P. Usman, learned counsel representing respondent No.2 submits that a caretaker has been appointed for the first respondent. 5. Having noted the contents of memo and heard Sri. P.T. Hebbar and Sri.P. Usman, following order is passed: ORDER (i) Revision Petition is dismissed as it has rendered infructuous. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50260 CRP No. 217 of 2022 (i) Rights of the petitioner if any in respect of the formation of the further committee or filing representation is protected, de hors dismissal of this revision petition. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC ct:SG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41