10 WP 12583.25.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.12583 OF 2025 Vinay Ramshankar Sharma …Petitioner Versus Rajesh Keshavji Gothi …Respondent Mr. Mayur V. Faria a/w Mr. Harshal Savla, Mr. Parth Bhanushali for Petitioner. Mr. Shobhit Shukla, for Respondent. CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 17th October 2025 P.C.: 1. At the outset, Mr. Shukla, learned Counsel for the Respondent states that the Writ Petition is not maintainable in view of the availability of an alternate remedy under Section 34 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. 2. In view of said contentions, Mr. Mayur Faria, learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks withdrawal of the Writ Petition with liberty to file appropriate proceedings. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of with liberty to file appropriate alternate proceedings. Dusane 10 WP 12583.25.DOC 4. It is clarified that this Court has not considered the merits and all contentions of both the parties are expressly kept open. (MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.) Dusane