Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7589 (CHH)

VEDRAM CHANDRAKAR @ CHOTU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/1213/2025 · 2025-02-12

Smt Rajani Dubey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:7533 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 1213 of 2025 1 - Vedram Chandrakar @ Chotu S/o Rajkumar Chandrakar Aged About 24 Years 2 - Vedprakash Chandrakar @ Ballu S/o Rajkumar Chandrakar Aged About 24 Years Both R/o Ward No. 2 Sitanagar Gogaon P.S. Gudhiyari District- Raipur (C.G.) Applicants versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The P.S. Khamtarai Raipur (C.G.) Respondent(s) For Applicants : Mr. N. Naha Roy, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajay Pandey, GA Hon’ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order on Board 12/02/2025 1. The accused/applicants have moved this third bail application under Section 483 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for releasing them on regular bail during trial in connection with Crime No.254/2022, registered at Police Station Khamtarai, 2 District Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of IPC and Sections 25 & 27 of the Arms Act. 2. The first bail application of the applicants was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 16.08.2022 in MCRC No.6303/2022 and thereafter the second bail application was dismissed on merits vide order dated 26.02.2024 in MCRC No.835/2024. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the crime in question. He further submits that the applicants are in jail for about 3 years and till now only 6 witnesses out of 15 have been examined. Therefore, the applicants may kindly be released on bail. 4. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the bail application of the applicant. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that after dismissal of the earlier bail application on merits, there is no change in the circumstances, therefore, I am not inclined to entertain this repeat bail application. 3 7. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed. However, the Trial Court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial expeditiously, preferably within a period of 6 months from today. Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) Judge Nirala