2025:UHC:6162 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No. 997 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Ms. Geeta Sajwan, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, learned AGA for the State. 3. Present applicant–Rupa Devi W/o Late Shri Om Prakash Chaman Singh is seeking regular bail in relation to first information report dated 10.02.2024, bearing FIR No. 0032 of 2024, Police Station Sahaspur, District Dehradun, in which five persons were implicated including the present applicant and her son Jasbeer for the offences punishable under Sections 304-B of IPC, 1860. 4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the deceased was died on 26.10.2023, and, thereafter, the post mortem was conducted on 27.10.2023, but the FIR was lodged on 10.02.2024, and, thereafter, the applicant was arrested on 04.12.2024 and since then she is languishing in jail. 5. She further submits that the charge- sheet has already been filed on 07.12.2024 and the trial has been commenced, and as such, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the present applicant and further taking into consideration that the present applicant has already suffered long incarceration, since she is languishing in jail since 04.12.2024, therefore, the applicant may be granted bail. 6. On the other side, learned State counsel has not disputed this fact that the charge- sheet has already been filed on 07.12.2024 and the trial has been commenced and the applicant is languishing in jail since 2025:UHC:6162 04.12.2024 and since the investigation has already been completed, therefore, as such, at this juncture, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the present applicant. 7. After hearing the arguments as advanced by learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that the present applicant is languishing in jail since 04.12.2024 and the charge-sheet has already been filed, and as such, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the present applicant, therefore, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 8. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the present bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant, namely, “Rupa Devi,” be released on bail, on her executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 15.07.2025 R.Bisht 2025:UHC:6162