THE COMMISSIONER NAGAR NIGAM v. RUSTAM KHAN S/O NAZEER KHAN
WRES/253/2024 · 2025-01-21
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7586 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7586 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:2933] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 253/2024 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.19721/2017 The Commissioner Nagar Nigam, Kota ----Petitioner Versus Rustam Khan S/o Nazeer Khan, Through Nagar Parishad Employee Union, Bengali Colony, Cantt. Kota. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Pal Singh for Mr. Neeraj Batra, GC For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 21/01/2025
1. Instant restoration application has been filed by petitioner- Nagar Nigam, seeking restoration of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.19721/2017, which came to be dismissed on account of non- prosecution vide order dated 11.09.2023.
2. Taking into consideration the reasons mentioned in the application, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the instant application, subject to deposition of cost.
3. Accordingly, the instant restoration application is allowed and S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.19721/2017 is allowed to be restored to its original number, subject to condition of deposition of a cost of Rs.2,000/- by way of demand draft in the name of Registrar General, Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur within a period of four weeks. Receipt of deposition of cost amount be
[2025:RJ-JP:2933] (2 of 2) [WRES-253/2024] placed in the file. The cost amount so deposited by the petitioner, may be disbursed to respondent, after completion of service of notice upon him in the main writ petition. However, in case of non-deposition of cost amount within the stipulated time period, as directed hereinabove, the restoration application be treated as dismissed.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/36