(2025:JHHC:21706) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.3874 of 2025 .... Pawan Kumar aged about 49 years, son of late Aniruddh Lal Sahu, resident of Makhalotganj, near Baroda Lane, district-Gaya, Bihar presently residing at Upper Bazar. P.O. P.S.-Kotwali, District-Ranchi through his duly constituted attorney and power of attorney holder namely Shiv Kumar Lal, aged about 54 years, son of late Kishori Mohan Lal, resident of Palkot road, Sarna Toli, P.O., P.S. and District- Gumla vide duly registered power of attorney no. 728 dated 04.10.2024 by District Sub Registrar, Ranchi .… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Gumla, P.O. & P.S.-Gumla, District-Gumla 3. The Circle Officer, Gumla, P.O. & P.S.-Gumla, District-Gumla .… Respondents .... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Praveen Akhauri, Adv. For the State : AC to AG .... 03/04.08.2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed for following relief:- “That the instant writ petition has been preferred for issuance of an appropriate WRIT/RULE/ORDER/DIRECTION in the nature of Mandamus commanding upon the respondents especially the respondent number 3 to issue land possession certificate in the name of the petitioner with respect to the lands owned by him pertaining to land measuring 3.25 acres appertaining to Khata number 69 plot number 1840 area 1.35 acres, plot number 1574 area 0.16 acres, plot number 1372 area 0.49 acres and Khata no.71 plot number 1776 area 1.25 acres of village- Armai, P.S.-Gumla, Thana no. 65, District- Gumla and for issuance of such other writ/rule/Order/Directions as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. The description of land is as follows:- “The land measuring 3.25 acres appertaining to Khata number 69 plot number 1840 area 1.35 acres, plot number 1574 area 0.16 acres, plot number 1372 area 0.49 acres and Khata no.71 plot number 1776 area 1.25 acres of village-Armai, P.S.-Gumla, Thana no. 65, District- Gumla.” 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the meantime, the permission sought for by the petitioner has already been rejected by the State authority and as such permission may be granted to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to work out his remedy in accordance with law. (2025:JHHC:21706) 2 W.P.(C) No.3874 of 2025 4. Permission is accorded. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Shahid/ uploaded