Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75855 (ALL)

ANOOP SINGH AND 85 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/9916/2025 · 2025-07-20

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:118011 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9916 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anoop Singh And 85 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Navin Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- Archana Singh,C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard Mr. Navin Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners, Ms. Archana Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. The petitioners who are 86 in numbers have approached this Court by means of this writ petition with the prayer to direct the respondents-authorities to consider the candidature of the petitioners for Inter District transfer on the post of Assistant Teacher in Primary Schools/Upper Primary Schools as per their online application in pursuance of Government order dated 23.05.2025 and further prayer to transfer the petitioners to the districts which has been opted by them in their online application in accordance with the Government order dated 23.05.2025. For ventilating of their grievances, they have moved several representations before the competent authority but nothing has been done till date. Ms. Archana Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.2 submits that she has no objection, in case, fresh representations are moved by the petitioners individually before the authorities concerned for redressal of their grievance, the same shall be considered in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioners, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that petitioners may make fresh applications/representations, individually, ventilating all their grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.2 U.P. Basic Education Board, U.P., Prayagraj through its Secretary, within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.2 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. Order Date :- 21.7.2025 Rahul. Digitally signed by :- RAHUL GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad