Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7585 (UTT)

SUNIL KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1188/2022 · 2025-07-02

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1188 of 2022 With WPCRL No.1195 of 2022 WPCRL No.1199 of 2022 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner(s). 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, D.A.G. with Mr. Vikas Uniyal, B.H. for the State. 3. Ms. Rajni Rangwal, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Pawan Mishra, Advocate for respondent no.3/Caveator. 4. State counsel, on instructions, which are taken on record, submitted that after investigation a charge sheet dated 28.03.2024 has been submitted against the petitioner(s), which is not disputed by counsel for the petitioner(s). 5. In view of the submission made by counsel for the parties, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous; however it is open to the petitioner(s) to challenge the said charge sheet before appropriate forum under appropriate provision of law. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 02.07.2025 SK