Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75844 (BOM)

DNYANESH KAMALAKAR SAMANT v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

WP/2414/2021 · 2025-10-17

Shri Sandeep V Marne

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Megha 23_wp_2414_2021.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2414 OF 2021 Dnyanesh Kamalakar Samant ...Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents ______________ Mr. Atul Tungare i/b. Ms. Aishwarya Tambe for the Petitioner. Mr. Deepan Dixit for Respondent No.4. Ms. Sulbha Chipade, AGP for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. Vinod B. Dhotre, Addl. Tahasildar (N.A.) Vasai, present in Court. ______________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATED: 17 OCTOBER 2025. P.C.: 1) The Petition has become infructuous as the order passed by the Tahasildar has already been set aside by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Mumbai Western Suburb (SDO) by his order dated 5 June 2025. Now the order passed by the SDO is subject matter of challenge before the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal. In that view of the matter nothing survives in the Writ Petition and the same is disposed of. 2) The Tribunal shall decide the proceedings on its own merits without being influenced by the observations made in the orders passed in the Petition. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Page No. 1 of 1 17 October 2025 2025:BHC-AS:45981-DB Signed by: Megha S. Parab Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 18/10/2025 15:23:47