IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81952 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-716 Year-2025 Thana- KATIHAR NAGAR District- Katihar ====================================================== Premlata Devi W/o Ajay Kumar Resident of - Officers Colony, Mirchaibadi, P.S.- Katihar Town (Sahayak), District - Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar Bihar 2. Shyam Sundar Sah S/o Late Buchan Sah Resident of - Dahian Chowk, Gandhi Path, Ward No. 08, P.S - Sahayak, District - Saharsa 3. Sanjay Kumar Gupta S/o Shree Shyam Sunder Sah Resident of - Dahian Chowk, Gandhi Path, Ward No. 08, P.S - Sahayak, District - Saharsa 4. Usha Devi W/o Shree Sanjay Kumar Gupta Resident of - Dahian Chowk, Gandhi Path, Ward No. 08, P.S - Sahayak, District - Saharsa 5. Kanahiya Sah S/o Nakul Prasad Sah R/o Mohalla - Goshala Road, P.S - Naugachiya, District - Bhagalpur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Rajpati For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh Mr. Prakash Chandra Jha Ms. Kumari Anjali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 8 13-08-2026 Heard the parties. 2. This application has been filed for cancellation of bail granted to the opposite party no. 02 to 05 vide order dated 27.09.2025 passed by the learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-V, Katihar in connection with Sahayak P.S. Case No. 716 of 2025. 3. On the earlier occasion, without going into the merits of the case, both the parties have agreed to settle their dispute upon payment of Rs. 21 lakhs to the petitioner by the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81952 of 2025(8) dt.13-08-2026 2/2 opposite parties and with regard to the same, three demand drafts, amounting to Rs. 21 lakhs, have been handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner by the learned counsel for the opposite parties and the same is accepted by him. 4. In view of the above, no ground of bail cancellation is made out. 5. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. Vikas/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U