Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75839 (KAR)

MR. SIDDHESH VISHNU RANE v. OFFICE OF OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR

CA/117/2023 · 2025-12-04

Jyoti M

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50822 CA No. 117 of 2023 In COP No. 214 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 117 OF 2023 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 214 OF 2012 BETWEEN: MR. SIDDHESH VISHNU RANE, S/O VISHNU RAMACHANDRA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, B/602, TAHSHILA, SIDDHESHWAR GARDEN, DHOKALI NAKA, KOLSHET ROAD, THANE WEST, MAHARASHTRA-400607. …APPLICANT (BY SRI. SUSHANTH BELUET, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. CHINTAN CHINNAPPA M., ADVOCATE) AND: OFFICE OF OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CORPORATE BHAVAN, NO.26-27, 12TH FLOOR, RAHEJA TOWERS, M.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. JAGADEESH GOUD PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR OL) THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 177 OF THE COMPANIES (COURT) RULES, 1959. THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:50822 CA No. 117 of 2023 In COP No. 214 of 2012 ORAL ORDER Sri.Sushanth Beluet, counsel on behalf of Sri.Chintan Chinnappa M. counsel for the applicant and Sri.Jagadeeshgoud Patil, counsel for Official Liquidator appeared in person. 2. Counsel for the applicant seeks time to comply with the office objections. 3. This court is not inclined to grant time. The reason is apparent. A perusal of the daily order sheet reflects that the application was listed on 03.01.2024 and on request made on behalf of the applicant, two weeks time was granted to comply with the office objection. It is almost one and half years, the applicant has not made any efforts to comply with the office objection. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the application. Hence, the application is dismissed for non-compliance of office objection. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7