Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75838 (ALL)

RINKI YADAV v. KUNWAR VIKASH YADAV AND 3 OTHERS

A227/7291/2025 · 2025-07-17

Manish Kumar Nigam

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:116754 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7291 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rinki Yadav Respondent :- Kunwar Vikash Yadav And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar Singh,Vijay Laxmi Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. The instant petition has been filed for following relief: " i To direct the Learned Civil Judge (S.D.), District Jaunpur to decide the 6C Application filed on 05.11.2024 arising out in original suit No. 696 of 2024 (Rinki Yadav Versus Kunwar Vikash Yadav) within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court" 2. From perusal of the writ petition, it appears that an application for interim injunction under Order 39 Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 2024 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. 3. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 4. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (S.D.), District Jaunpur to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), if not already decided, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 18.7.2025 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad