SMT VENKAMMA @ VEENASWAMY v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
WP/24602/2025 · 2025-08-18
R Devdas
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75827 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75827 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31915 WP No. 24602 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 24602 OF 2025 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SMT.VENKAMMA @ VEENASWAMY, W/O SRI.VENKATASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, RESIDING AT ADITHYA APARTMENT, NO.71 AND 72, KUVEMPU ROAD, RAJESHWARI LAYOUT, YELECHENAHALLI VILLAGE, BANGALORE - 560 078. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUDHAKAR G V., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, K.G ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE SOUTH DIVISION, KANDHYA BHAVAN, 2ND FLOOR, K.G ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009.
3.
THE TAHASILDAR, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 009.
Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31915 WP No. 24602 of 2025
4. SMT.REVAMMA, W/O. LATE NANJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, RESIDING AT UTTARI VILLAGE, KAGGALIPURA POST, KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE SOUTH, BANGALORE - 560 116. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SESHU V., HCGP FOR R-1 TO R-3)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I) SET ASIDE THE
ORDER DATED 03/04/2025 PASSED IN CASE NO. R.A (S) NO.450/2024-25 BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE SOUTH SUB-DIVISION, BANGALORE THE RESPONDENT NO.2 HEREIN IN RESPECT OF THE LAND MEASURING 29 GUNTAS OUT OF 3 ACRES 5 GUNTAS AND 2 GUNTAS KARAB IN SY.NO.129/8 OF UTTARI VILLAGE, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT (ANNEXURE-A) AS ILLEGAL AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader takes notice for respondent Nos.1 to 3. Notice to respondent No.4 is not necessary for the following reasons.
2. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the revision petition filed before the Deputy Commissioner at page No.123 is not being received by the Deputy
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31915 WP No. 24602 of 2025
Commissioner on the ground that the certified copy of the impugned order passed by the Assistant Commissioner at Annexure-A in R.A(S)No.450/2024 is not furnished by the petitioner.
3. Learned HCGP submits that if that is the case, direction may be issued to the Deputy Commissioner or his office to receive the appeal with a condition that certified copy shall be produced by the petitioner or to consider the application for dispensation of production of certified copy.
4. The submission of the learned HCGP is accepted. The writ petitioner is accordingly disposed of, directing the first respondent Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore Urban District to receive the appeal that is filed by the petitioner and afford an opportunity to the petitioner to either produce the certified copy of the impugned order or consider the application that would be filed by the petitioner for dispensation of production of the certified copy.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31915 WP No. 24602 of 2025
Ordered accordingly. Learned High Court Government Pleader is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KVR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28