Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75812 (ALL)

ARUN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/15595/2025 · 2025-09-09

Santosh Rai, Siddharth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 15595 of 2025 Court No. - 47 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J. HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J. 1. List revised. 2. Sri Rakesh Yadav, Durgesh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA are present. 3. None appears on behalf of respondent no.4 even in the revised call. 4. Smt. Manju Thakur, learned AGA-Ist informs that as per the statement of daughter of respondent no.4 under Section 183 B.N.S.S. she is a consenting party and has not made any allegation against the petitioner no.1. 5. Considering the fact that both petitioner no.1 and daughter of respondent no.4 are major and are of marriageable age and no counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no.4 opposing the writ petition, the impugned FIR dated 23.6.2025 in Case Crime No.0478 of 2025, under Sections 87, 352, 351(2) B.N.S., Police Station Pipraich, District Gorakhpur is quashed. 6. The writ petition is allowed. 7. Investigating officer of this case is directed to make entry of this compromise in the case diary. 8. Let this order be communicated to the S.S.P., Gorakhpur, by the Registrar (Compliance) within 10 days. September 10, 2025 RA Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Rajendra Prasad Shukla, Rishabh Shukla (Santosh Rai,J.) (Siddharth,J.) Arun And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAZIQ ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad