-I-j4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMAR MONDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE :PRESENT.I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NOS.-1680 & 2737 OF 2025 CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1680 OF 2025 Betwee n : 1. Divya Maram, W/o. Muirathnam Reddy, Aged 39 R/o. GangudupaIIi, Village, Dornkambala, Tirupati. 2. Munjrathnam Reddy Kamasanj, s/o. K Muni Reddy, Aged 45, R/o. Gangudupalli VI®llage, Dornkambala, Tirupati. .,..Petitioners/Al and A2 AND 1. The State ofAndhra Pradesh, (SHO, Tirupati Rural Police Station) Rep.J by its public Prosecutor, Hl-gh Court of Andhra Pradesh BuI-ldingS, At Amaravati. 2. K.Saradha, D/o Late K Subramanyam Reddy, Aged about 30 years, occ. software Engineer, R/o.D.No.4-149,Srikrishna Nagar, MuthyalareddyPalli,Tirupathi DI®StriCt, A.P. Respondent No 2 I-S imPleaded as per the Court order dated 24 03 2025 in IANo.1 of2025 in Crl P No 1680of2025. ...Respondent/ De-facto Complainant PetitI'On under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the criminalpetition, the High Court may be pleased to dI'reCt the respondent POll'Ce tO enlarge the petitioners herein (Al and A2) on bail in the event of theI'r arrest in connection with Crime No. 51 of 2025 of Tirupati Rural, Police Station, Tjrupati DI'S{riCt. The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and I memorandum of grounds of criminal petition and the orders of the High Court dated.-25-.02.2025, 04.O3.2025,10.03.2025, 24.03.2025, 02.04.2025, 09.04.2025 , 21.04.2025 & 06.05.2025 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of SriPosaniAkash, Advocate for the Petitioner, and of Public Prosecutor for the Respondent, CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2737 OF 202L± Between : 1. Munirathnam Reddy Kamasani, ,S/o. K Muni Reddy, Aged 45, R/o. GangudupaIIi, Village, Dornkambala, Tirupati. 2. Divya Maram, W/o. Munirathnam Reddy, Aged 39 R/o. Gangudupalli, Village, Dornkambala, Tirupati. petitioners/Accused 1 & 2 AND The State OfAndhra Pradesh, (SHO, Tirupati Rural Police Station) Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court ofAndhra Pradesh Buildings, At Amaravati. Respondent/Complajnant Petition under Section 482 of BNSS (438 of Cr.P.C.,) praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent police to enlarge the petitioners herein (Al and A2) on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No. 93 of 2025 of Tirupati Rural Police Station, TirupatI' District The petition coml-ng on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit fl-led in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of SRI MUTYALA SOBHANADRI NAIDU Advocate for the petitI'OnerS, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent and the court made the foIIowI'ng rf. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION ORDER:- Nos.1680 and 2737 OF 2025 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the state. 2. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are arrayed as accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime' NOs.51 of 2025 and 93 of 2025 of Tirupati Rural Police Station, Tirupati District, for alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338 read with 3(5) of BNS. 3. Learned senior counsel submits that the petitioners are the joint owners of the land which was purchased in lthe auction conducted by APSFC. The petitioners entered into development agreement vide registered deed on 16.12.2022. The share of the petitioners and the builder was also clearly mentioned in the joint development agreement. It is submitted that the, disputes between the petitioners and the land lords arose on account of share of the flats and false complaints came to be filed against the petitioners. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits ,that the petitioners are facing allegations in six other cases and has forvarded the list of cases pending against the petitioners. 5. As seen from the list of cases of the accused, all the cases relates to the same property and the same transaction. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioners, on the`following conditions:- i. ln the event of the arrest, petitioners shall be released on bail on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten RE- dg3f-_J, -. * thousand only) each, with two sureties each for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the arresting police officials. ii. The petitioners shall make themselves available for investigation as and when required and that they shall not cause any threat, inducement or promise to the prosecution witnesses. 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petitions are allowed. //TRUE COPY// RAJ U IT RAE a To-A The SHO, T\ruPa\= _R^uT^a\ll?^O#^e`sSH\a#=T\ueP#D#i\C\ 2 One CC tO SRI POSANI AKASH, Advocate [OPUCl 3 One CC tO SRI MUTYALA SOBHANADR` NAIDU, Advocate [OPUCl, 4i T=\O= CCcCst=o SpRL BNIL=CTYpARLoAsSEuCbunT^%`R=vi\i h Court Of AndhTa PTadeSh [oUT1 5. One SPare COPY `--- ``=-9 se HIGH COURT HN,J DATED :23/06/2025 BAIL ORDERS CRIMINAL PETITION MOS: 1680 & 2737 OF 2025 ALLOWED