Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75795 (PNJ)

SUKHWINDER KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/18069/2023 · 2025-04-24

Harsh Bunger

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APURVA 2025.05.02 09:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CWP-18069-2023 -2- 2. Today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Learned State counsel, at the outset, submits that the instant writ petition has become infructuous as the term of Panchayat already stands expired. 4. Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions made by learned State counsel, the present writ petition is accordingly disposed of, as having been rendered infructuous. 5. However, in case any of the grievances of petitioner still remains unaddressed, she shall be at liberty to seek revival of this writ petition. 6. All the pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed. 24.04.2025 (HARSH BUNGER) Apurva JUDGE 1. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No 2. Whether reportable : Yes/No APURVA 2025.05.02 09:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh