Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75795 (KAR)

SRI A C NAGARAJ v. SRI A C NANJAPPA

RSA/939/2023 · 2025-10-10

H P Sandesh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40038 RSA No. 939 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.939 OF 2023 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI A.C. NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 71 YEASR S/O LATE A.M. CHANDRASHEKARAIAH R/AT NO.1179, 9TH MAIN, 3RD CROSS GOKULAM 3RD STAGE, V.V.MOHALLA MYSURU CITY-570 002. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. P. NATARAJU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI A.C. NANJAPPA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS S/O LATE A.M.CHANDRASHEKARIAH R/AT NO.69, 4TH CROSS ST. JOSEPHS CONVENT ROAD BANNIMANTAP MANDI MOHALLA MYSURU-570 015. 2. SRI A.C. VASUDEVA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS S/O LATE A.M.CHANDRASHEKARAIAH R/AT NO.54/2, 1ST CROSS FOUNTAIN STREET TILAK NAGR MANDI MOHALLA MYSURU-570 007. Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40038 RSA No. 939 of 2023 3. A.C. LALITHA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS D/O LATE A.M.CHANDRASHEKARAIAH R/AT NO.63, 10TH CROSS E.D. HOSPITAL ROAD TILAK NAGAR MANDI MOHALLA MYSURU-570 007. 4. A.C. SHARADA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS D/O LATE A.M.CHANDRASHEKARIAH R/AT NO.54/1, 1ST CROSS FOUNTAIN STREET TILAK NAGAR MANDI MOHALLA MYSURU-570 007. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.MANIVANNAN, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.01.2023 PASSED IN RA NO.203/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE VII ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MYSURU. DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.12.2019 PASSED IN OS NO.121/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, MYSURU. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:40038 RSA No. 939 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for respondent No.4 has filed a memo dated 31.07.2025 reporting the death of appellant and respondent No.2 along with the death certificates of appellant and respondent No.2. 2. Inspite of the memo filed reporting the death of appellant and respondent No.2, steps have not been taken. Hence, the appeal is dismissed as abated. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7