IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-3184-2025 Date of decision : 22.08.2025 Bharat Bhushan Setia ....Petitioner V/s Anurag Rastogi, Additional Chief Secretary to Govt. of Haryana, Finance Department and another .…Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present : Mr. Himanshu Setia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anuj Garg, DAG Haryana ***** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in compliance of order dated 17.03.2025 passed in CWP No. 7168 of 2025 (Annexure P-1), certain benefits have been granted and the State has also preferred a Letters Patent Appeal against order dated 17.03.2025. He submits that since substantial benefits have been granted, he does not press the contempt petition at this stage and that in case something remains to be granted after the LPA is finally decided, the petitioner shall avail all such remedies as shall be admissible in law. In view of the statement given by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant contempt petition is disposed of as not having been pressed. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) 22.08.2025 JUDGE reena Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No REENA 2025.08.24 21:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh