1 / 3 2025:CGHC:8634 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 839 of 2025 1 - Devanand Kaushik S/o Late Shivcharan Kaushik Aged About 49 Years R/o Village Chichirda P.O. Saida Tahsil Sakri District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Revenue Depatment Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Atal Nagar Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Commissioner Bilaspur Division District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector Bilaspur District -Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - The Sub Divisional Officer Takhatpur District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - The Tahsildar Sakri District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 6 - Gram Pachayat Chichirda Through Its President Ram Prasad Suryavanshi R/o Village Chichirda Tahsil Sakri District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. A. S. Rajput, Advocate For Respondents/State : Ms. Upasana Mehta, Dy. Govt. Advocate 2 / 3 (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 19/02/2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved by the remarks made by the revenue authorities in Form P-II with respect to the land bearing Khasra No.420 admeasuring total area of 2.780 Hectare situated at village Chichirda, Tahsil Takhatpur (now Sakri), District Bilaspur wherein it has been mentioned that out of 2.780 Hectare, 0.10 Acre of land stated to be encroached by the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the land in question has not been encroached by the petitioner which was certified by the Patwari by Panchnama dated 13/10/2024 and the report dated 14/10/2024 to the Tahsildar submitted by the Patwari. The said fact has been brought before the Tahsildar vide representation dated 23/09/2024 submitted by the petitioner to the Tahsildar with a request to delete the remarks made in the Form P-II wherein it has been stated that the petitioner has encroached upon the land in question. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that if the representation submitted by the petitioner is still pending before the Tahsildar, necessary steps shall be taken by the Tahsildar by considering the representation filed by the petitioner, within a period of 50 days. 3 / 3 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents. 5. From perusal of the pleadings, it appears that the petitioner has not encroached upon the land in question and the revenue authorities has made remarks against the petitioner which may be deleted from the revenue records. 6. In view of the above, the concerned Tahsildar shall consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioner by verifying the grievance raised by him and take necessary steps to delete the remark Column No.12 within a period of 50 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE $. Bhilwar