Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7576 (RAJ)

HANUMAN v. STATE

CRLR/910/2007 · 2025-07-23

Shubha Mehta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:27589] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 910/2007 Hanuman S/o Nanu Ram, R/o Dhani Rudawali, Tan Sirohi, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, Distt. Sikar, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Sogarwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Poonia, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 23/07/2025 fuxjkuhdkj&vfHk;qDr ds thfor jgus laca/kh fjiksVZ fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us izLrqr dh] ftldh vksj ls vkt vf/koDrk mifLFkr gSA fopkj.k U;k;ky;] vfr0 eq[; U;kf;d eftLVªsV] uhe dk Fkkuk }kjk fu;fer QkStnkjh izdj.k la[;k&83@2001 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukafdr 28-11-2003 ds }kjk fuxjkuhdkj&vfHk;qDr dks /kkjk 323] 326] 447 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa nks"kfl) ,oa n.Mkfn"V djrs gq, vf/kdre rhu o"kZ ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl o 100 :i;s ds vFkZn.M ls nf.Mr fd;k x;kA bl fu.kZ; ds fo:) fuxjkuhdkj&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy la[;k&22@2003 esa vihyh; U;k;ky;] vij lS'ku U;k;k/kh'k] uhe dk Fkkuk] lhdj }kjk fu.kZ; fnukad 14-08-2007 ikfjr dj fuxjkuhdkj dks /kkjk 323] 447 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa c:, jkthukek nks"keqDr fd;k x;k Rkk /kkjk 326 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa 06 ekg ds dBksj dkjkokl o 100 :i;s ds vFkZn.M ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gS] ls O;fFkr gksdj fuxjkuhdkj&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk is'k dh xbZ gSA cgl lquh xbZA fo}ku vf/koDrk fuxjkuhdkj&vfHk;qDr dk dFku jgk fd os vfHk;qDr dh nks"kflf) dks dksbZ pqukSrh ugha nsrs gSa ,oa vfHk;qDr dks Hkqxrh gqbZ [2025:RJ-JP:27589] (2 of 4) [CRLR-910/2007] ltk ij NksM+rs gq, blh izdze ij iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk dks fuLrkfjr djus dk fuosnu djrs gSaA mudk ;g Hkh dFku jgk fd fuxjkuhdkj&vfHk;qDr 88 o"kZ dh vk;q dk gksdj ydokxzLr gSA jkLrs ds fookn dks ysdj ?kVuk dkfjr gqbZ Fkh rFkk vc i{kdkjksa ds e/; le>kSrk gks pqdk gS] tks rF; vihyh; U;k;ky; ds vkns'k esa Hkh vafdr gSA ?kVuk 26 o"kZ iqjkuh gksdj fnukad 09-11-1999 dh gSA fuxjkuhdkj&vfHk;qDr iwoZ esa 21 fnol vfHkj{kk esa jg pqdk gSA vr% ujeh dk :[k viukrs gq, fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dks Hkqxrh gqbZ ltk ij NksM+us dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA mUgksaus vius rdZ leFkZu esa fuEu U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa dk voyEc fy;k& 1- Alister Anthony Pareira Vs. State of Maharashtra MANU/SC/0015/2012 : (2012) 2 SCC 648 2- Haripada Das Vs. State of W.B. MANU/SC/1627/1998 : (1998) 9 SCC 678 3- Chotu Ram vs. State S.B. Criminal Rev. Pet. No. 905/2003 Dated 15.01.2025 Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us bldk fojks/k fd;kA fuxjkuhdkj&vfHk;qDr ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dh lhfer izkFkZuk dks ns[krs gq, bl iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk dk blh izdze ij fuLrkj.k fd;k tkuk mfpr gSA rdksZa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA izLrqr U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa dk /;kuiwoZd v/;;u fd;k x;kA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA izdj.k dh rF;kRed fLFkfr ds vuqlkj ifjoknh Jhjke us ,d rgjhjh fjiksVZ bl vk'k; dh ntZ djkbZ fd fnukad 09-11-1999 dks 'kke N% cts jkLrs esa ?kj ds lkeus guqeku flag o vU; us NM+h Mky nh] ftl ij euk fd;k] rks mlds ?kj esa vkdj mlds ukd ij dqYgkM+h ekjh] ftlls mldk ukd dV x;k rFkk deyks dks ykBh ls ekjh] ftlls mlds pksVsa vkbZA mDr fjiksVZ ij izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ntZ dh tkdj ckn vuqla/kku fuxjkuhdkj&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa vkjksi i= izLrqr fd;k x;kA rRi'pkr~ fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vfHk;qDr ds fo:) /kkjk 447] 323] 326 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dk vkjksi i`Fkd ls fojfpr dj lqukrs gq, miyC/k vfHk;kstu lk{; ds vk/kkj ij fuxjkuhdkj&vfHk;qDr dks vkjksfir vijk/k esa nks"kfl) djrs gq, vf/kdre rhu o"kZ ds lk/kkj.k dkjkokl o 100 :i;s vFkZn.M ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k] ftlds fo:) vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr vihy esa vihyh; [2025:RJ-JP:27589] (3 of 4) [CRLR-910/2007] U;k;ky; }kjk mls /kkjk 447] 323 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds vkjksi esa c:, jkthukek nks"keqDr djrs gq, /kkjk 326 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa 06 ekg ds dBksj dkjkokl ds n.M ls nf.Mr fd;k x;kA fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls nks"kflf) dks dksbZ pqukSrh ugha nh xbZ gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa xq.kkoxq.k ij nksuksa U;k;ky;ksa ds vkykSP; fu.kZ;ksa dk miyC/k lk{; ds izdk'k esa fo'ys"k.k o foospu fd;s tkus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gSA dsoy fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dks Hkqxrh gqbZ ltk ij NksM+us dh lhfer izkFkZuk ij fopkj fd;k tkuk gSA izdj.k dh ?kVuk 26 o"kZ iqjkuh gS] ftlesa fuxjkuhdkj dks vf/kdre N% ekg ds dkjkokl ds n.M ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gSA fuxjkuhdkj&vfHk;qDr dks vihyh; U;k;ky; ds vkns'k ds i'pkr~ n.M Hkqxrkus gsrq vfHkj{kk esa Hkstk x;k Fkk rFkk mldk ltk LFkxu izkFkZuki= Lohdkj gksus ij fnukad 29-08-2007 dks mls fjgk fd;k x;k FkkA bl izdkj vfHk;qDr 21 fnol dh vof/k vfHkj{kk esa O;rhr dj pqdk gS rFkk o"kZ 1999 ls og vUoh{kk Hkqxr jgk gSA fuxjkuhdkj yxHkx 88 o"kZ dh vk;q dk gksdj ydokxzLr gksuk crk;k x;k gSA jkLrs ds fookn dks ysdj izdj.k dh ? kVuk dkfjr gqbZ Fkh rFkk i{kdkjksa ds e/; le>kSrk Hkh gks pqdk gS] ftldk mYys[k vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk vius fu.kZ; esa fd;k x;k gS rFkk jkthukek Hkh i=koyh ij miyC/k gSA fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dh iwoZ esa fdlh vU; izdj.k esa nks"kflf) laca/kh dksbZ rF; i=koyh ij miyC/k ugha gSA fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) dksbZ izfrdwy rF; Hkh vfHkys[k ij izLrqr ugha gqvk gSA vr% vc mls dkjkokl Hkqxrk;s tkus gsrq tsy Hksts tkus ls fdlh lkFkZd mn~ns'; dh iwfrZ ugha gksxhA vfHk;qDr dks fn;s x;s dkjkokl ds n.M dks Hkqxrh gqbZ ltk rd ?kVkus@lhfer djus ds laca/k esa izLrqr U;kf;d fofu'p;ksa esa izfrikfnr fuEu fl)kUr egRoiw.kZ o lqlaxr gS %& Alister Anthony Pareira (Supra) "There is no straitjacket formula for sentencing an accused on proof of crime. The courts have evolved certain principles: twin objective of the sentencing policy is deterrence and correction. What sentence would meet the ends of justice depends on the facts and circumstances of each case and the court must keep in mind the gravity of the crime, motive for the crime, nature of the offence and all other attendant circumstances." [2025:RJ-JP:27589] (4 of 4) [CRLR-910/2007] Haripada Das (Supra) "...considering the fact that the respondent had already undergone detention for some period and the case is pending for a pretty long time for which he had suffered both financial hardship and mental agony and also considering the fact that he had been released on bail as far back as on 17-1-1986, we feel that the ends of justice will be met in the facts of the case if the sentence is reduced to the period already undergone..." ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds mi;qZDr U;kf;d fofuf'p;ksa esa izfrikfnr fl)kUr ,oa orZeku izdj.k ds rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dks fn;s x;s vf/kdre N% ekg ds dkjkokl dks ?kVkrs gq, mlds LFkku ij mls vc rd Hkqxrh gqbZ ltk ij NksM+k tkuk U;k; ds fgr esa i;kZIr vkSj U;k;ksfpr izrhr gksrk gSA ifj.kker% fuxjkdkj&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk nks"kfl)h dh gn rd fujLr dh tkrh gSA n.Mkns'k ds fcUnq ij Lohdkj dh tkrh gS ,oa fopkj.k U;k;ky; rFkk vihyh; U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr n.Mkns'k dks mikUrfjr@la'kksf/kr djrs gq, N% ekg ds dBksj dkjkokl ds LFkku ij fuxjkuhdkj&vfHk;qDr dks Hkqxrh gqbZ ltk ls nf.Mr fd;k tkrk gSA fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vf/kjksfir vFkZn.M dh jkf'k ,oa vne vnk;xh vFkZn.M dh ltk ;Fkkor jgsxhA rnuqlkj ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gSA fu.kZ; dh izfr ds lkFk v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dk vfHkys[k vfoyEc izsf"kr fd;k tkosA (SHUBHA MEHTA),J VISHAL SHARMA /18