IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2707 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20748 of 2014 ====================================================== 1. Vijay Kumar Singh Son of Late Arjun Singh, Resident of Village- Sherullahpur, Nandgaon, P.O.-Shastri Nagar, P.S. Shastri Nagar, District- Patna. 2. Uday Shankar Prasad, Son of Late Arjun Singh, Resident of Village- Gorgama, P.O.-Khagaul, P.S.-Shahpur, District-Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The Union of India through Secretary Mr. Sri V. Uma Shankar Ministry of Road Transport and Highways Govt. of India, New Delhi. 2. The Deputy Secretary, Mr. Shri Mayank Tyagi, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India, New Delhi. 3. The National Highway Authority of India through its Chairman cum Secretary, Mr. Shri Ajay Tamta, Ministry of Shipping, Road Transport and Highways, Govt. of India, New Delhi. 4. The Project Director, Mr. Shri Akhil Khare, the National Highway Authority of India, D-36, Srikrishnauri, Patna. 5. The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate cum Collector, Dr. Tiyati Rajan M.S. Patna. 6. The District Land Acquisition Officer cum Competent Officer Mr. Mahendra Prasad, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Raghwanand, Government Advocate - 11 For the NHAI : Dr. Maurya Vijay Chandra, Advocate Mr. Barun Jha, Advocate Ms. Preety Ranjan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 20-08-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defect(s). 2. Heard the parties. 3. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): Patna High Court MJC No.2707 of 2025(3) dt.20-08-2026 2/2 “for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their willful disobedience of the order dated 12.08.2018 passed in CWJC No. 20748 of 2014.” 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that liberty be granted to approach appropriate Court for the redressal of the grievance. 5. Learned State counsel has no objection. 6. Granting liberty to the petitioners to agitate the matter, the present contempt petition stands disposed of. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U