Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75757 (PNJ)

CHANDA JHAKRI KHADKA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/7254/2025 · 2025-07-09

Rajesh Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-72 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 112 Chanda Jhakri State of Punjab Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No.4 to 7, who are harassing and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them in order to save their prestige in the society. 2. petitioners are major and petitioner no.1 is unmarried. It is submitted that both the petitioners are living in live relationship against the wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to petitioners have submitted respondent no.2 for granting protection to their life and liberty. 3. 4. respondent-S 7254-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Chanda Jhakri and another Versus Punjab and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Mohan Singh Rana, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents , who are harassing and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them in order to save their prestige in the society. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major and petitioner no.1 is married. It is submitted that both the petitioners are living in live relationship against the wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to petitioners have submitted a representation dated 0 respondent no.2 for granting protection to their life and liberty. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State. - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7254-2025 Decided on:09.07.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj , Advocate, The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents , who are harassing and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major and petitioner no.1 is a divorcee and petitioner no.2 is married. It is submitted that both the petitioners are living in live relationship against the wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to 7. The a representation dated 06.07.2025 (Annexure P-3) to respondent no.2 for granting protection to their life and liberty. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. , accepts notice on behalf of the ...Petitioners ...Respondents The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents , who are harassing and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the 2 is married. It is submitted that both the petitioners are living in live-in relationship against the wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted . The 3) to , accepts notice on behalf of the VINOD KUMAR 2025.07.09 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-72 5. value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2 Nagar Mohali and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. 6. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of their live July 09, 2025 vinod* 7254-2025 Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, District Nagar Mohali, to decide the representation (Annexure P and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of their live-in relationship. July 09, 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Superintendent of Police, District SAS presentation (Annexure P-3) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever in relationship. (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a SAS 3) of the petitioners It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever VINOD KUMAR 2025.07.09 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document