CHANDA JHAKRI KHADKA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/7254/2025 · 2025-07-09
Rajesh Bhardwaj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75757 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75757 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-72 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
112
Chanda Jhakri State of Punjab
Coram :
Present:
Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral)
1.
the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents No.4 to 7, who are harassing and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them in order to save their prestige in the society.
2.
petitioners are major and petitioner no.1 is unmarried. It is submitted that both the petitioners are living in live relationship against the wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to petitioners have submitted respondent no.2 for granting protection to their life and liberty.
3.
4.
respondent-S 7254-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Chanda Jhakri and another
Versus Punjab and others
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Mohan Singh Rana, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents , who are harassing and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them in order to save their prestige in the society.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major and petitioner no.1 is married. It is submitted that both the petitioners are living in live relationship against the wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to petitioners have submitted a representation dated 0 respondent no.2 for granting protection to their life and liberty. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State.
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRWP-7254-2025
Decided on:09.07.2025
...Petitioners
...Respondents Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj , Advocate, The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents , who are harassing and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major and petitioner no.1 is a divorcee and petitioner no.2 is married. It is submitted that both the petitioners are living in live relationship against the wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to 7. The a representation dated 06.07.2025 (Annexure P-3) to respondent no.2 for granting protection to their life and liberty. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. , accepts notice on behalf of the
...Petitioners ...Respondents The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondents , who are harassing and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the 2 is married. It is submitted that both the petitioners are living in live-in relationship against the wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted . The 3) to , accepts notice on behalf of the VINOD KUMAR 2025.07.09 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-72
5. value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2 Nagar Mohali and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. 6. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of their live
July 09, 2025 vinod*
7254-2025
Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, District Nagar Mohali, to decide the representation (Annexure P and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of their live-in relationship. July 09, 2025
Whether Speaking/Reasoned:
Whether Reportable:
- 2 - Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Superintendent of Police, District SAS presentation (Annexure P-3) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever in relationship. (Rajesh Bhardwaj)
Judge Whether Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES
NO/YES
Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a SAS 3) of the petitioners
It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the law, if any, committed by them.
This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever
VINOD KUMAR 2025.07.09 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document