Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75756 (KAR)

SRI A R SWAMY v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/8343/2022 · 2025-11-19

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48071 WP No. 8343 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 8343 OF 2022 (GM-KSR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI A R SWAMY S/O RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/A NOL.90/23, 11TH CROSS 2ND MAIN ROAD VITTALANAGARA CHAMARAJPETE BANGALORE - 560 018 2. SRI MAHADEVAMURTHY S/O THAMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/A NO.34/1, 6TH CROSS AZAD NAGAR CHAMARAJPETE BANGALORE - 560 018 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SATEESH N.K., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SRIKANTH M.P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY CO OPERATIVE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001 Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48071 WP No. 8343 of 2022 2. THE REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES SECOND CIRCLE BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT NO.146, SAHAKARA SOUDHA 2ND FLOOR, 8TH CROSS 3RD MAIN, MARGOSA ROAD MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE - 560 003 3. KANIYARA SEVA SAMAJA REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISION OF KSR ACT 1960 KANIYARA COLONY CHAMARAJPET BANGALORE - 560 018 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1 AND R2 SRI. V.B. SHIVAKUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3) ------ THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 27.01.2022 BEARING 02/2018-19 PASSED BY THE R-2 VIDE ANNEXURE-J, DIRECT THE RES-2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 10.01.2022 OF THE 1ST PETITIONER AND TO TAKE APPROPRAITE ACTION IN THE MATTER ANNEXURE-H AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48071 WP No. 8343 of 2022 ORAL ORDER Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for quashing of the endorsement dated 27.01.2022 (Annexure-J), inter alia sought for a direction to respondent No.2 to reconsider the representation dated 10.01.2022. 3. Having taken note of the factual aspects on record, as per the bye-law of respondent No.3-Society, election will be conducted once in 3 years. In that view of the matter, I am of the view that the prayer made by the petitioner has become infructuous. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE rs List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48 CT-SG