- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54023 CMP No. 436 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 436 OF 2024 BETWEEN: M/S NETSCRIBES DATA AND INSIGHTS PRIVATE LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS NS OXYMORON ADVISORS PVT LTD) HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO 504, 5TH FLOOR, LODHA SUPREMUS LOWER PAREL, MUMBAI 400013 REP. BY ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE, SRI YUVRAJ PRABHAKAR GHARAT S/O PRABHAKAR ANANT GHARAT AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS …PETITIONER (BY SRI. P VITTAL SHETTY., ADVOCATE) AND: M/S DUNZO DIGITAL PVT LTD HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.2 1ST FLOOR, SAIDEEP SRINIDHI WARD NO 73, NAL WIND TUNNEL ROAD MURUGESHPALYA, BENGALURU 560017 REP. BY ITS CO-FOUNDER AND DIRECTOR SRI DALVIR SURI AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS …RESPONDENT THIS CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11(5) AND (6) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996, PRAYING TO A. APPOINT A SOLE ARBITRATOR AS PER CLAUSE 17.2 OF THE SERVICE AGREEMENT DATED: 15.09.2022 AND THE SAME WAS AMENDED ON 20.2.2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ANNEXURE-B FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADJUDICATION A DISPUTE BETWEEN THE PARTIES, AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:54023 CMP No. 436 of 2024 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a. Appoint a Sole Arbitrator as per clause 17.2 of the Service Agreement dated: 15.09.2022 and the same was amended on 20.2.2022 vide annexure-A and Annexure-B for the purpose of adjudication a dispute between the parties, and b. Grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon ble Court deems fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of the present case and in the interest of Justice and Equity. 2. None appears for the petitioner. 3. Despite the order dated 28.11.2025, neither the process fee has been paid nor is there any appearance on the part of the petitioner. 4. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 138