2025:UHC:6869 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No.989 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Mr. Saurabh Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant appears through V.C. 2. Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Present applicant–Harimohan S/o Chandrapal Singh is seeking regular bail in relation to first information report dated 28.08.2024 bearing FIR No.0347 of 2024, Police Station Kiccha, District Udham Singh Nagar, wherein the present applicant has been implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2) and 318(2) of BNS, 2023. 4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the charge-sheet has already been filed and the applicant and other co-accused, namely, Pawan Joshi have been charge-sheeted for the offences punishable under Section 316(5) and 318(2) of BNS, 2023. 5. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that since the charge-sheet has already been filed, and as such, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the present applicant, and, furthermore, the applicant is having no previous criminal history and is languishing in jail since 21.04.2025 6. It is further argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the other co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by this Court and the present applicant claims parity. 7. On the other side, learned State counsel, Mr. Himanshu Sain, have not disputed this fact that the charge-sheet has 2025:UHC:6869 already been filed, and as such, there is no need of custodial interrogation, and, furthermore, the applicant deserves for the benefit of the parity since the other co- accused, Pawan Joshi, has already been enlarged on bail. 8. After hearing the arguments as advanced by learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that the charge-sheet has already been filed, and as such, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the present applicant and also the present applicant deserves for parity, since the other co-accused, namely, Pawan Joshi, has already been enlarged on bail by this Court, therefore, the applicants deserve for bail on the ground of parity. 9. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the instant bail application is allowed. 10. Let the applicant, namely, Harimohan, be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 05.08.2025 R.Bisht 2025:UHC:6869