MOHAMMAD SULIMAN HAJAM v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (REVENUE) AND ORS
WP(C)/1246/2025 · 2025-05-28
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7575 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7575 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 153 Supplementary Cause List IN THE HIGH C0URT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 1246/2025 CM(3307/2025)
MOHAMMAD SULIMAN HAJAM …Appellant/Petitioner(s) Through: Ms. Arifa Jan, Adv. Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF J&K AND OTHERS. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, Dy. AG
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 28.05.2025
After arguing for a while when the learned counsel was confronted with the maintainability of the instant petition in absence of any accrual of alleged cause of action, the learned counsel seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to file representation before the appropriate authority. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. However, this will not come in the way of the petitioner to agitate the cause afresh in case fresh cause of action accrues in future.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 28.05.2025 Sakeena