IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Punjab Dairy Development Corporation State of Punjab CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. for the petitioner. Mr. Shekhar Verma, Additional A.G., DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 Nagar Mohali, (Annexure P-13 2. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. 3. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Development and Panchayat decision on the of the petitioner hearing to all concerned, preferably within one a copy of this order. 4. Needless to add th petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. September 03 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : Sr. No.112 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-18797- Date of Decision : Punjab Dairy Development Corporation Ltd. Versus and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Ritesh Pandey, Advocate, or the petitioner. Mr. Shekhar Verma, Additional A.G., *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-Director Rural Development and Panchayat Mohali, to take a decision on the representation 13) made on behalf of the petitioner. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection if the above prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Development and Panchayats Department, District SAS Nagar, Mohali decision on the representation dated 03.06.2025 (Annexure P the petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of ll concerned, preferably within one month a copy of this order. Needless to add that the decision so taken be and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE September 03, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT -2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 03.09.2025 …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Shekhar Verma, Additional A.G., Punjab. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Director Rural Development and Panchayats Department, SAS representation dated 03.06.2025 the petitioner. Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Director, Rural , District SAS Nagar, Mohali, to take a (Annexure P-13), made on behalf , by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of month from the date of receipt of at the decision so taken be communicated to the and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, he would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law. DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.09.05 09:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document