- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51624 WP No. 18569 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 18569 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. D SHIVALINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O LATE DALI GOWDA, R/AT NO.6/108, KATRIGUPPE MAN ROAD, BSK II STAGE,BENGALURU - 560 085. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHESH KIRAN SHETTY S, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY KANVA SOUHARDHA CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE LIMITED AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, KARNATAKA PUBLIC LANDS CORPORATION, 2ND FLOOR, OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BEHIND KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. 2. THE KANVA SOUHARDHA CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE LIMITED REGISTERES UNDER KARNATAKA SOUHARDHA CO- OPERATIVE ACT Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51624 WP No. 18569 of 2022 NO.861, "SRI SAI COMPLEX", OPP.MODI HOSPITAL, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU - 86. REPRESENTED BY ITS SPECIAL OFFICER. 3. THE BASAVESHWARANAGAR POLICE BASAVESHWARANAGAR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU. REPRESENTED BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER. 4. THE TAHSILDAR BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, OFFICE OF THE THASILDAR, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VEERESH R BUDHIHAL, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R3 & R4; V/O DATED 14/12/2023-NOTICE TO R2 IS D/W) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE OFFICIAL MEMORANDUM DATED 24.09.2020 IN NO. KPLC/CA / 01/2020-21 ISSUED BY FIRST RESPONDENT AS PER ANNEXURE-C AND TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED IN MISC. 291/2021 BY THE XCI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE FOR KPIDEF CASES, BENGALURU (CCH-92) DATED 22.09.2021 AS PER ANNEXURE-F AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:51624 WP No. 18569 of 2022 ORAL ORDER Learned counsels representing the respective parties submit that, the respondent herein, has handed over the possession of property in question. 2. Taking note of the submission made by learned counsels appearing for the respective parties, no further orders has to be made in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE NM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41