Amk 22-wp 1539-21.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1539 OF 2021 Kunal Patil … Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ... Respondents _______________________________ Mr. Zain Shroff i/b. M/s. YNA Legal for the Petitioner. Mr. Ashish I. Satpute, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. M. J. Bhatt for Respondent No.2. _______________________________ CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE , JJ. DATED : 7th NOVEMBER, 2025. P. C. :- 1) Mr. Shroff, learned Advocate for Petitioner seeks adjournment on the ground that he has not yet received further instructions on the Affidavit filed by the Joint Commissioner of Police, Thane. 2) Mr. Bhatt, learned Advocate appearing for Respondent No.2 vehemently opposed the adjournment. He submitted that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the Petition, as repeated adjournments are being sought. 3) Perusal of record prima-facie supports the contention of the Petitioner. 1/2 Amk 22-wp 1539-21.doc We therefore requested Advocate Mr. Shroff to assist us in hearing the Petition. Advocate Mr. Shroff expressed his inability to assist the Court in hearing of the Petition, for want of instructions from his client. 4) In view thereof, it appears to us that, the Petitioner is not seriously interested in pursuing the Petition. 5) Dismissed for want of prosecution. (RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.) (A. S. GADKARI, J.) 2/2