IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No. 1627 of 2025 1. Krishan Kumar Singh, aged about 66 years son of late Bigan Nath Singh, permanent resident of vill.- Chery, P.O.- Kamrey, P.S.- Kanke,Dist.- Ranchi 2. Uma Shankar Singh aged about 56 years son of late Bigan Nath Singh, resident of village- Chery, P.O. Kamrey, P.S.- Kanke, Dist.- Ranchi 3. Mithilesh Kumar Singh aged about 62 years son of Dineshwar Nath Sai, resident of village- Chery, P.O.-Kamrey, P.S.-Kanke, District- Ranchi 4. Kamakhya Narayan Singh, aged about 66 years, son of late Naval Kishor Nath Singh, resident of village-Chery, P.O.- Tamrey, P.S. Kanke, District- Ranchi Presently residing at near Gumla Jai, Shashtri Nagar, Gumla, P.O. & P.S.- Gumla, Dist.- Gumla … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioners : Mr. Praveen Akhauri , Adv. For the State : Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey , Addl.. PP 02 / 11.03.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with CID P.S. Case No. 46 of 2024 registered under Sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners are trying to grab the land owned by the informant by preparing fake documents. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and those allegations are vague. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the dispute between the parties is at best a civil dispute and the ancestor of the petitioners have redeemed the mortgage. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that no specific document is alleged to have been created by way of a false document. It is next submitted that the petitioners are ready to co-operate with the investigation of the case and also undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and they undertake not to annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during pendency of the case hence, the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the petitioners shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 10,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned AJC- XVIII-cum- Special Judge, CID, Ranchi in connection with CID P.S. Case No. 46 of 2024 subject to the condition that the petitioners will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during pendency of the case and will co-operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile phone number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of BNSS, 2023. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-