Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75682 (KAR)

SRI MANJUNATH V B v. SMT LATHA

WP/22682/2021 · 2025-09-04

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34975 WP No. 22682 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO.22682 OF 2021 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: SRI MANJUNATH V B S/O BASAPPA AGRICULTURIST AND COOLIE AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT NO.112, VEERAPURA TARIKERE TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 547 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GOPALAKRISHNAMURTHY C., ADV.) AND: SMT LATHA W/O MANJUNATH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS AGRICULTURIST WORK R/AT HADAGALU VILLAGE ANTHARAGHATTE POST, KADUR TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 547. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. G. LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD. 25.10.2021 ORDER PASSED ON I.A.NO.III UNDER ORDER XXVI RULE 10(A) R/W 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE AND UNDER SECTION 45 OF INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, VIDE ANNX-E IN M.C.NO.40/2016 PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND PRINCIPAL JMFC, TARIKERE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34975 WP No. 22682 of 2021 CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER As per the report dated 16.08.2025, placed before this Court by the Director, Mediation Centre, Chikkamagaluru, it is recorded that the parties appeared before the Mediation Centre, Chikkamagaluru, on 12.05.2025, 26.05.2025, 30.06.2025, 14.07.2025, 02.08.2025 and 16.08.2025 2. A memorandum of settlement has been filed stating that both parties have agreed to live together along with their son. In view of the same, no further orders are required to be passed in this petition. 3. Accordingly, writ petition stands disposed of in the light of the memorandum of settlement. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and the same stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE SV: List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31