MEENAKSHI SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/10004/2025 · 2025-07-20
Manju Rani Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75674 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75674 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:118661 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10004 of 2025 Petitioner :- Meenakshi Singh And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shiv Sagar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Archana Singh,C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard Mr. Shiv Sagar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Hare Ram, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondent, Ms. Archana Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 and perused the record. The petitioner has preferred instant writ petition for a direction upon respondents to consider & allow their transfer and after taking choice being surplus in the institution where the petitioners are working as per decision of the respondent no.2 vide order dated 26.06.2025.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for ventilation of their grievances, the petitioners have approached the authority concerned by moving representations. However, despite several representations moved by the petitioners, no heed has yet been paid.
Learned counsel for the State-respondents submits that in case petitioners move fresh application/representation before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all their grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.2; Secretary, Uttar Pradesh Basic Shiksha Parishad, Prayagraj within two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.2 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a
reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment.
Order Date :- 21.7.2025 Jitendra/- Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad