SMT SUJATHAMMA v. SMT BHOVI DURGADEVI @BHOVI DURUGAMMA
RSA/859/2018 · 2025-09-08
K Manmadha Rao
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75673 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75673 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35536 RSA No. 859 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 859 OF 2018
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT SUJATHAMMA W/O. BASAVARAJAPPA, AGE: 50 YEARS, OCCUPATION: AGRICULTURIST, R/O. KULAHALLI VILLAGE, HARAPANAHALLI TALUK, DAVANGERE DISTRICT-583133. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. MAHESH R UPPIN., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
SMT BHOVI DURGADEVI @BHOVI DURUGAMMA W/O. BHOVI NAGARAJA, AGE: 33 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, R/O. MALLANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, KUDLIGI TALUK, BELLARY DISTRICT - 583134.
2.
SMT. BHOVI BASAMMA W/O. BHOVI MANJAPPA, AGE: 48 YEARS, R/O. KANCHIKERI VILLAGE, HARAPANAHALLI TALUK, DAVANGERE DISTRICT - 583125.
3.
BHOVI RUDRAPPA S/O. LATE HALAPPA, AGE: 38 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST,
Digitally signed by VIJAYALAKSHMI B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35536 RSA No. 859 of 2018
4.
BHOVI NAGESH S/O. LATE HALAPPA, AGE: 36 YEARS,
5.
BHOVI HANUMAVVA W/O. LATE HALAPPA, AGE: 67 YEARS,
RESPONDENTS 3-5 ARE R/O. KULAHALLI VILLAGE, HARAPANAHALLI TALUK, DAVANAGERE DISTRICT - 583131.
6.
LAMBANI TUKARAMANAIK, S/O. RAMACHANDRANAIK, AGE: 64 YEARS, R/O. KOMARANAHALLI THANDA, HUVINAHADAGALI TALUK, BELLARY DISTIRICT - 583219. …RESPONDENTS (RESPONDENTS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS RSA FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND 23.01.2018 PASSED IN R.A.NO.24/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.12.2015 PASSED IN O.S.NO. 68/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE, HARAPANAHALLI.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35536 RSA No. 859 of 2018
ORAL JUDGMENT
The appellant's counsel files a memo stating that this appeal pertains to Dharwad Bench and prays to transfer the same to Dharwad Bench. The memo reads as follows:
"The above matter pertains to Dharwad Bench. Hence, it may be ordered to be transferred to the Dharwad Bench in the interest of justice".
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. In view of the memo and for statistical purpose, this appeal is disposed of.
4. Registry is directed to transfer this appeal to Dharwad Bench.
Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE
GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7