Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75665 (PNJ)

GURPREET KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/7206/2025 · 2025-08-12

Sanjay Vashisth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-7206-2025 - 1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 250 CRWP-7206-2025 Date of decision: 12.08.2025 GURPREET KAUR ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present : Mr. S.P.Soi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manjinder Singh Bhullar, DAG, Punjab. SANJAY VASHISTH. J.(Oral) 1. Petitioner - Gurpreet Kaur, aged about 56 years, has filed instant petition for issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus for releasing of detenue, namely, Surjit Kaur, who is mother-in-law of the petitioner, from the illegal detention of respondent No.4. 2. In the instant petition, on 07.07.2025, following order was passed:- “Petitioner - Gurpreet Kaur, aged about 56 years, has filed instant petition for issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus for releasing of detenue, namely, Surjit Kaur, who is mother-in-law of the petitioner, from the illegal detention of respondent No.4. The only son of the detenue-Surjit Kaur (aged more than 80 years) and also her grandson have already expired. The detenue is residing with her niece (brother’s daughter) since the year 2019. Petitioner wants to meet the detenue, to whom she has not seen since the year 2019. Notice of motion. Mr. Neeraj Madaan, Sr. DAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 to 3. Adjourned to 12.08.2025. AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2025.08.13 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment CRWP-7206-2025 - 2- Dasti also.” 3. Mr. Rajesh Bhatheja, Advocate, puts in appearance on behalf of the respondent No.4, and files his Vakalatnama, which is taken on record and submits that petition has been filed without detailing the complete and correct facts. In fact detenue- Surjit Kaur is residing in Canada since 20.04.2023 along with her daughter and has never come back after the said date. 4. Faced with the situation, counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to file an appropriate petition before the appropriate Forum under the relevant provisions of law. 5. Dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as sought and recorded here- above. (SANJAY VASHISTH) 12.08.2025 JUDGE amandeep Whether speaking/reasoned. : Yes/No Whether Reportable. : Yes/No AMANDEEP GOSAIN 2025.08.13 10:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment