Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:115689 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 22765 of 2025 Petitioner :- The Committee Of Management Shri Daivi Sampad Brahmcharya Sanskrit Mahavidyalya Mumuksh Aashram And Another Respondent :- The State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shivendu Ojha,Sr. Advocate,Ved Prakash Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shesh Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayers:- "(A) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 04.06.2025 (Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition) passed by the Registrar of the University i.e. Respondent No. 3. (B) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authorities i.e. Respondent No.2, Vice Chancellor of the University to pass a fresh order after considering the claims set up by the petitioner. (C) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authorities i.e. Respondent No. 4, Assistant Registrar Firms, Societies and Chits, Bareilly to take decision under Section 4/25(1) of the Societies Registration Act." 2. Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners without entering into merits of the case at this stage, made an innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file a fresh objection before the competent authority, who is respondent no.2 and further prayed for a direction for expeditious decision on that objection, in accordance with law, in time bound manner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.2- University vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. 4. Heard Sri R.K. Ojha, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Shivendu Ojha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State- respondents, Sri Shesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos.2 and 3, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Since, the matter is not pressed on merits at this stage, only made an innocuous prayer, taking into consideration of the submissions and contents made in the writ petition, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. The petitioners are permitted to file a detailed objection along with certified copy of this order before the competent authority as stated above within a period of two weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Thereafter, the competent authority i.e. respondent no.2, Vice Chancellor, Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, Varanasi is directed to pass the detailed order, without influencing from the impugned order, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving of the said objection. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. . (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Order Date :- 17.7.2025 Atul Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad