2025:HHC:12191 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No. 226 of 2025 Decided on : 02.05.2025 Satish Kumar. …Petitioner Versus Sh. Onkar Chand Sharma and another. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Vishali Lakhanpal, Advocate, vice Mr. Parav Sharma, Advocate For the respondents : Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though now the petitioner has been reengaged but he is not being paid salary even after his re-engagement. 2. In the light of the fact that the order of the Court now stands complied with and the petitioner has been reengaged, these proceedings are disposed of with direction that post his re-engagement, the petitioner be granted the salary for the 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:12191 work, which the petitioner is performing in the Department. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge May 02, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)