ANANT NAMDEV PARAB v. M.C.G.M. THRUGH ASST. COMMISSIONER
IA/3840/2025 · 2025-11-04
Aarti A Sathe, Shri G S Kulkarni
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75627 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 75627 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
4-WPL-39932-22.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3840/2025 IN WRIT PETITION (L) NO.39932 OF 2022 Mr. Anant Namdev Parab … Applicant IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Mr. Anant Namdev Parab ...Petitioner Versus MCGM & Anr. ...Respondents _______ Mr. Kishore Mulji Maru, for Applicant/Petitioner. Ms. Pushpa Yadav i/b. Ms. Komal Punjabi, for Respondent-BMC. Ms. Priyanka Bhadrashete, for Respondent No.2/SRA. _______ CORAM:
G. S. KULKARNI & AARTI SATHE, JJ. DATE: 4 November 2025 P.C.
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3840/2025wp
1. By this interim application, the learned counsel for the Applicant/Petitioner has prayed that the Petition which came to be dismissed for non-removal of the office objections, be restored to the file of this Court by condoning the delay in filing the interim application.
2. Having perused the averments made in the application, we are of the opinion that the Petitioner be permitted to remove the office objections within a Mane MANISH SURESHRAO THATTE Digitally signed by MANISH SURESHRAO THATTE Date: 2025.11.06 11:12:46 +0530
4-WPL-39932-22.DOC period of four weeks from today and the Petition be restored to the file of this Court by condoning the delay in filing this Interim Application,
3. Interim Application is disposed of. No costs.
4. Writ Petition is restored to the file of this Court.
WRIT PETITION (L)NO. 39932/2022 We have heard learned counsel for the parties on the Writ Petition on which we propose to pass independent Order.
(AARTI SATHE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) Mane