HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 22812 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. 2. By means of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital/live- in life of petitioners, has been sought. 3. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions received, stated that an FIR has been lodged in the instant case, which was registered as Case Crime No. 198 of 2025, under Section 127(6) BNS, Police Station-Dannahar, District-Mainpuri, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. The said instructions is taken on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 11, 2025 #Vik/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satya Narayan Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Smt. Nutan And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad