DINESH KUMAR SOOD v. THE ASSAM STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION and 3 ORS.
WP(C)/7066/2016 · 2025-01-19
Kardak Ete
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7562 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7562 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010030822016
2025:GAU-AS:445
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7066/2016 DINESH KUMAR SOOD S/O LT. DHARAMPAL SOOD, R/O PALTAN BAZAR, GHY-8, DIST- KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM VERSUS THE ASSAM STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION and 3 ORS.
PALTAN BAZAR, GHY-8, DIST- KAMRUP METRO, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR 2:SAMAR NANDI S/O SUDHIR NANDI R/O C/O ISBT CANTEEN BETKUCHI PIN-781034 DIST- KAMRUP METRO ASSAM 3:REJINA BEGUM W/O MUKLUSER REHMAN R/O C/O ISBT CANTEEN BETKUCHI PIN-781034 DIST- KAMRUP METRO ASSAM 4:MUKLUSER REHMAN S/O - R/O C/O ISBT CANTEEN BETKUCHI PIN-781034 DIST- KAMRUP METRO
Page No.# 2/2 ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.D BARUAH, MR.S SHARMA,MR.N N UPADHAYA,MR.A K PURKAYASTHA Advocate for the Respondent : , ,,SC, A S T C
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
O R D E R
20.01.2025
None appears for the petitioner on call. It is noticed that despite repeated orders passed by this Court as well as Lawazima Court, no steps has been taken, nor any representation. It is also noticed that on 11.03.2019, Mr. D. Baruah, learned counsel for the petitioner had made a submission that he has received unconfirmed report that the petitioner had expired. Thereafter, neither there is any report nor any instruction. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter. In that view of the matter, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant