- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52130 WP No. 28194 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 28194 OF 2025 (GM-CON) BETWEEN: M/S. DEEPAM SILKS AND SAREES BLUEMOON COMPLEX, 2ND FLOOR, M.G ROAD, BANGALORE-560001. REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SMT. C GEETHA RANJANI (CHANDRASHEKAR GEETHA RAJANI, PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN) …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BALASUBRAMANYA B N, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. PADMA AIYAPPA W/O KAMBEYANDA LATE AIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, SAI KRUPA ESTATE, KOLAGADALU, CHERAMBANE POST, MADIKERI TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT - 571201. 2. IN THE KODAGU DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AKASHAVANI ROAD NEAR VARTHABHAVAN, MADIKERI-571201. REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER, TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 12/05/2025 PASSED BY THE KODAGU DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52130 WP No. 28194 of 2025 COMMISSION, MADIKERI IN CC NO. 95/2024 I.E., ANNEXURE-A AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF AS THIS HONBLE COURT MAY DEEM FIT AND PROPER IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: Wherefore, in the light of the above, the petitioner most respectfully prays that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order, to set aside the impugned order dated 12/05/2025 passed by the Kodagu District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Madikeri in CC No. 95/2024 i.e., Annexure-A and grant such other relief as this Hon’ble court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity. 2. What has been challenged is the warrant issued in the execution proceedings. Upon enquiry as to whether the award passed by the Consumer Forum has been challenged, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it has not been challenged. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52130 WP No. 28194 of 2025 3. If that be so, the present petition seeking issuance of a warrant without challenging the award is not sustainable. 4. Reserving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the award, the petition stands disposed of. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7