- - 1 HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S.KAMAL & SRI. K.RAJASHEKAR, MEMBER R.F.A. 333/2025 (Lok Adalat No.8080/2025) BETWEEN: SRI. G. RADHA KRISHNA S/O G. RAMACHANDRAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT NO.135/A, 7TH MAIN 40TH CROSS, 5TH BLOCK JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 041. REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER SRI. B.G. GIRISH S/O LATE B.V. GOVINDAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT 37, PIPELINE MAIN ROAD T. DASARAHALLI, MALLASANDRA BENGALURU - 560 057. ...APPELLANT - - 2 (BY SRI. LINGARAJU B.L., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE KARNATAKA STATE JUDICIAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED NO.7/2, 'SURYA CHAMBERS' 2ND FLOOR, 1ST MAIN ROAD SESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU - 560 020 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE PRESIDENT THE KARNATAKA STATE JUDICIAL EMPLOYEES HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED NO.7/2, 'SURYA CHAMBERS' 2ND FLOOR, 1ST MAIN ROAD SESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU - 560 020 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. ……RESPONDENTS (BY SMT B.V. VIDYULATHA., ADVOCATE) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.10.2024 PASSED IN O.S.3881/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE VI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE BENGALURU CITY, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED: - - 3 CONCILIATION ORDER Sri. B.G. Girish S/o Late Sri. B.V. Govindappa, GPA holder of the appellant-Sri.G. Radha Krishna, is personally present along with Sri. Lingaraju B.L, learned counsel for the appellant. 2. Smt. B.V. Vidyulatha, learned counsel for the respondents along with Vice president of the respondent-Co- operative society is present. 3. Parties and their respective learned counsels' submit that they have settled the dispute amicably and they have filed compromise petition, terms of the which reads as under: '' 7. The terms and conditions of the compromise/settlement arrived at between the parties are as follows: The Respondent Society has passed a Board Resolution stipulating that an amount of Rs.2,000/- per square feet shall be paid for the Site No.2048, and the Appellant has agreed to this amount, thereby resolving the matter through amicable settlement. b. The Appellant has agreed to pay a sum of Rs. 21,30,000/-to the respondent society in furtherance of the said amicable settlement, by way of Demand Draft or NEFT within a period of 90 days from the date of filing the present Compromise Petition before the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka. The respondent society on receipt of the said sum agrees that it would withdraw the challenge made by it in O.S.No.3881/2010 and would admit that the appellant is the owner in actual possession of the schedule property. c. The Appellant undertakes to pay the settlement amount of Rs.21,30,000/- as aforementioned within a period of 90 days from the date of filing the present Compromise Petition. d. The Respondent shall assist and provide necessary support to the Respondent in obtaining the requisite documents for securing the Khatha in respect of the Schedule Property. All expenses incurred for obtaining the Khatha shall be borne by the Appellant. - - 4 e. The parties further agree that they shall not raise any future claims or disputes in respect of the schedule property. In the event that any representative of the Respondent or any third party raises a dispute regarding the said property, the then- serving office bearers or authorized representatives of the Respondent society shall take necessary steps to resolve such disputes in accordance with law. f. That both parties agree that the present Appeal may be disposed in terms of this compromise petition. '' 4. Parties have understood the terms of the compromise, the terms of the compromise do not appear to be contrary to any provisions of law. Accordingly, compromise petition is taken on record. 5. Appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise petition. 6. Draw decree accordingly. 7. Permissible Court fee be refunded to the appellant on proper identification. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER RL