Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 75593 (BOM)

JADHAV MANGALU PATIL v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER DHULE AND ANR

FA/3208/2008 · 2025-11-28

Shri Sanjay A Deshmukh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

903(1) FA NO. 3205 OF 2008++.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 903 FIRST APPEAL NO. 3205 OF 2008 1. Hari Deochand Marathe Age: 69 years, Occu: Farmer, R/o Bramhanpuri, Tq. Shahada Dist. Nandurbar ….APPELLANT VERSUS 1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer Medium Project, Dhule Tq. & Dist. Dhule 2. The State Of Maharashtra Through Colletor, Dhule, Tq. & Dist. Dhule (Now District Nandurbar) 3. The Executive Engineer, Nimna Tapi Pathbandhare Vibhag, Nandurbar Tq & Dist. Nandurbar ….RESPONDENTS WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 823 OF 2007 1. Sudam Sajan Patil (Deceased) Through L.Rs. 1A) Vitthal Sudam Patil, Age: 38 years, Occu: Agri R/o. Mohida, Tq. Shahada, Dist. Nandurbar 1B) Latabai Udhav Patil Age: 50 years, Occu: Agri R/o Ashispur, Tq. Shahada Dist. Nandurbar 1C) Vimalben Pitambar Patil Age: 47 years, Occu: Agri 1 of 21 2025:BHC-AUG:36779 (( 2 )) 903(1) FA NO. 3205 OF 2008++ R/o Kurawad, Tq. Shahada Dist. Nandurbar 1D) Smt. Nabibi Sudam Patil Age: 70 years, Occu: Agri R/o Maloni, Tq. Shahada, Dist. Nandurbar ….APPELLANTS (Appellant No.1A is power of Attorney Holder of Appellant Nos. 1B to 1D) VERSUS 1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer Medium Project, Dhule Tq. & Dist. Dhule 2. The State Of Maharashtra Through Colletor, Dhule, Tq. & Dist. Dhule (Now District Nandurbar) 3. The Executive Engineer, Nimna Tapi Pathbandhare Vibhag, Nandurbar Tq & Dist. Nandurbar ….RESPONDENTS WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2010 Madhukar Gorakh Patil (Deceased) Through L.rs. 1A Vikasbhai S/o Madhukar Patil Age: 25 years, Occu: Education 1B Sau. Rupali W/o Nayan Patel Age: 30 years, Occu: Household 1C Smt. Meenaben W/o Madhukar Patil Age: 50 years, Occu: Household All R/o Lonakhada, tq. Shahada Distrcit- Nandurbar ….APPELLANTS 2 of 21 (( 3 )) 903(1) FA NO. 3205 OF 2008++ VERSUS 1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer Medium Project, Dhule Tq. & Dist. Dhule 2. The State Of Maharashtra Through Colletor, Dhule, Tq. & Dist. Dhule (Now District Nandurbar) 3. The Executive Engineer, Nimna Tapi Pathbandhare Vibhag, Nandurbar Tq & Dist. Nandurbar ….RESPONDENTS WITH X-OBJECTION NO. 32 OF 2023 IN FA/1451/2007 Uddhav S/o Gorak Patil, Age: 59 years, Occu: Farmer, R/o Maloni, Tq. Shahada District Nandurbar ….PETITIONER VERSUS 1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer Medium Project, Dhule Tq. & Dist. Dhule 2. The State Of Maharashtra Through Colletor, Dhule, Tq. & Dist. Dhule (Now District Nandurbar) 3. The Executive Engineer, Nimna Tapi Pathbandhare Vibhag, Nandurbar Tq & Dist. Nandurbar ….RESPONDENTS WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2769 OF 2010 3 of 21 (( 4 )) 903(1) FA NO. 3205 OF 2008++ Bansi Ghanshyam Patil (Deceased) Through L.rs. 1. Ravindra Bansi Patil Age: 38 years, Occu: Agri 2. Mohan Bansi patil Age: 35 years, Occu: Agri 3. Sumanbai W/o Bansi Patil Age: 62 years, Occu: Agri., 4. Chhayabai W/o Vilas Patil Age: 40 years, Occu: Agri All R/o Lonkheda Tq. Shahada Dist. Nandurbar ….APPELLANTS VERSUS 1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer Medium Project, Dhule Tq. & Dist. Dhule 2. The State Of Maharashtra Through Colletor, Dhule, Tq. & Dist. Dhule (Now District Nandurbar) 3. The Executive Engineer, Nimna Tapi Pathbandhare Vibhag, Nandurbar Tq & Dist. Nandurbar ….RESPONDENTS WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2768 OF 2010 Nagin Murar Patil (Died) Through L.rs 1. Nabiben Nagin Patil Age: 69 years, Occu: Agri 2. Sau. Kantabai Vitthal Patil, 4 of 21 (( 5 )) 903(1) FA NO. 3205 OF 2008++ Age: 37 years, Occu: Agri 3. Leelaben Uddhav Patil Age: 34 years, Occu: Agri 4. Hiraben Sharad Patil Age: 37 years, Occu: Agri 5. Meeraben Sharad Patil Age: 30 years, Occu: Agri 6. Nitin Nagin Patil Age: 27 years, Occu; Agri All R/o. Alchi, tq. Shahada, Dist. Nandurbar ….APPELLANTS VERSUS 1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer Medium Project, Dhule Tq. & Dist. Dhule 2. The State Of Maharashtra Through Colletor, Dhule, Tq. & Dist. Dhule (Now District Nandurbar) 3. The Executive Engineer, Nimna Tapi Pathbandhare Vibhag, Nandurbar Tq & Dist. Nandurbar ….RESPONDENTS WITH X-OBJECTION NO. 34 OF 2023 IN FA/80/2008 Bula Gorakh Patil Age; 61 years, Occu: farmer R/o Maloni, Tq. Shahada Dist. Nandurbar ….PETITIONER VERSUS 1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer Medium Project, Dhule 5 of 21 (( 6 )) 903(1) FA NO. 3205 OF 2008++ Tq. & Dist. Dhule 2. The State Of Maharashtra Through Colletor, Dhule, Tq. & Dist. Dhule (Now District Nandurbar) 3. The Executive Engineer, Nimna Tapi Pathbandhare Vibhag, Nandurbar Tq & Dist. Nandurbar ….RESPONDENTS WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 3209 OF 2008 Chhabibai Dashrath Patil Age: 42 years, Occu: Farmer R/o Bramhanpuri Tq. Shahada Dist. Nandurbar ….APPELLANT VERSUS 1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer Medium Project, Dhule Tq. & Dist. Dhule 2. The State Of Maharashtra Through Colletor, Dhule, Tq. & Dist. Dhule (Now District Nandurbar) 3. The Executive Engineer, Nimna Tapi Pathbandhare Vibhag, Nandurbar Tq & Dist. Nandurbar ….RESPONDENTS WITH X-OBJECTION NO. 33 OF 2023 IN FA/125/2008 Ramesh Shripat Patil Age; 54 years, Occu: Farmer, R/o. Brahmanpuri, Tq. Shahada Dist. Nandurbar ….PETITIONER VERSUS 6 of 21 (( 7 )) 903(1) FA NO. 3205 OF 2008++ 1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer Medium Project, Dhule Tq. & Dist. Dhule 2. The State Of Maharashtra Through Colletor, Dhule, Tq. & Dist. Dhule (Now District Nandurbar) 3. The Executive Engineer, Nimna Tapi Pathbandhare Vibhag, Nandurbar Tq & Dist. Nandurbar ….RESPONDENTS WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 4187 OF 2008 Ramesh Dathu Patil Age: 47 years, Occu: Farmer R/o Bramhanpur, tq. Shahada Dist. Nandurbar ….APPELLANT VERSUS 1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer Medium Project, Dhule Tq. & Dist. Dhule 2. The State Of Maharashtra Through Colletor, Dhule, Tq. & Dist. Dhule (Now District Nandurbar) 3. The Executive Engineer, Nimna Tapi Pathbandhare Vibhag, Nandurbar Tq & Dist. Nandurbar ….RESPONDENTS WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 4186 OF 2008 1. Lilabai W/o Hilal Marathe Age: 39 years, Occu: Agri 7 of 21 (( 8 )) 903(1) FA NO. 3205 OF 2008++ 2. Laxmi D/o Chudaman Marathe, Age: 39 years, Occu: Agri 3. Bhatu Chudaman Marathe Age: 45 years, Occu: Agri All R/o Brahmanpuri, Tq. Shahada Dist. Nandurbar ….APPELLANTS VERSUS 1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer Medium Project, Dhule Tq. & Dist. Dhule 2. The State Of Maharashtra Through Colletor, Dhule, Tq. & Dist. Dhule (Now District Nandurbar) 3. The Executive Engineer, Nimna Tapi Pathbandhare Vibhag, Nandurbar Tq & Dist. Nandurbar ….RESPONDENTS WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 4193 OF 2008 Dashrath Nattu Patil Age: 67 years, Occu: Farmer R/o Bramhanpuri, Tq. Shahada, Dist. Nandurbar ….APPELLANT VERSUS 1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer Medium Project, Dhule Tq. & Dist. Dhule 2. The State Of Maharashtra Through Colletor, Dhule, Tq. & Dist. Dhule (Now District Nandurbar) 8 of 21 (( 9 )) 903(1) FA NO. 3205 OF 2008++ 3. The Executive Engineer, Nimna Tapi Pathbandhare Vibhag, Nandurbar Tq & Dist. Nandurbar ….RESPONDENTS WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 3540 OF 2008 Bhikubai Shripat Patil Deceased Through L.Rs. 1. Ramesh Shripat Patil Age: 65 years, Occu: Agri., R/o. Brahmanpuri, Tq. Shahada, Dist. Nandurbar 2. Kamalbai W/o Jadhav Patil, Age: 58 years, Occu: Household, R/o Junawane, Tq. Shahada, Dist. Nandurbar 3. Meerabai W/o Damu Patil Age: 55 years, Occu: Household, R/o Shirud-Digar, Tq. Shahada, Dist. Nandurbar 4. Ramdas S/o Natthu Patil Age: 43 years, Occu: Agri R/o Shahada, Tq. Shahada, Dist. Nandurbar ….APPELLANTS VERSUS 1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer Medium Project, Dhule Tq. & Dist. Dhule 2. The State Of Maharashtra Through Colletor, Dhule, Tq. & Dist. Dhule (Now District Nandurbar) 9 of 21 (( 10 )) 903(1) FA NO. 3205 OF 2008++ 3. The Executive Engineer, Nimna Tapi Pathbandhare Vibhag, Nandurbar Tq & Dist. Nandurbar ….RESPONDENTS WITH X-OBJECTION NO. 35 OF 2023 IN FA/2917/2008 Devkabai W/o Bhatu Marathe (Died) Through L.Rs. Ganesh S/o Bhatu Marathe (Died) Through L.Rs., 1A) Sunanda W/o Ganesh Marathe Age: 50 years, Occu: Household 1B) Tyagraj S/o Ganesh Marathe Age: 31 years, Occu; Service 1C) Sapna D/o. Ganesh Marathe Age: 29 years, Occu: Household 1D) Prashant S/o Ganesh Marathe Age: 27 years, Occu: Education 2A) Chhayabai W/o Ambadas Nawale Age: 45 years, Occu: Household Applicant No.1A to 2A R/o Bramhanpuri, Tq. Shahada Dist. Nandurbar ….PETITIONERS VERSUS 1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer Medium Project, Dhule Tq. & Dist. Dhule 2. The State Of Maharashtra Through Colletor, Dhule, 10 of 21 (( 11 )) 903(1) FA NO. 3205 OF 2008++ Tq. & Dist. Dhule (Now District Nandurbar) 3. The Executive Engineer, Nimna Tapi Pathbandhare Vibhag, Nandurbar Tq & Dist. Nandurbar ….RESPONDENTS WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 4189 OF 2008 1. Prabhakar Chhoutulal Vispute Died Through L.rs. 1-A Mangalabai W/o Prabhakar Vispute Age: 69 years, Occu; retired 1-B Pavan S/o Prabhakar Vispute, Age: 32 years, Occu: Classes 1-C Sonal W/o Nandkumar Randhir, Age: 44 years, Occu: Household 1-D Shilpa W/o Vinayak Sonawane Age: 42 years, Occu: Household 1-E Prachi W/o Rahul Sonawane Age: 40 years, Occu: Household All applicants R/o Bramhanpuri, Tq. Shahada, Dist. Nandurbar ….APPELLANTS VERSUS 1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer Medium Project, Dhule Tq. & Dist. Dhule 2. The State Of Maharashtra Through Colletor, Dhule, Tq. & Dist. Dhule (Now District Nandurbar) 11 of 21 (( 12 )) 903(1) FA NO. 3205 OF 2008++ 3. The Executive Engineer, Nimna Tapi Pathbandhare Vibhag, Nandurbar Tq & Dist. Nandurbar ….RESPONDENTS WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 4188 OF 2008 Chagan Tarachand Marathe Age: 67 years, Occ: Farmer, R/o. Bramhanpuri, Tq. Shahada Dist. Nandurbar ...APPELLANT VERSUS 1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer Medium Project, Dhule Tq. & Dist. Dhule 2. The State Of Maharashtra Through Colletor, Dhule, Tq. & Dist. Dhule (Now District Nandurbar) 3. The Executive Engineer, Nimna Tapi Pathbandhare Vibhag, Nandurbar Tq & Dist. Nandurbar ….RESPONDENTS WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 4190 OF 2008 1. Sudam Sadu Patil (Deceased) 2. Krushna Sadu Patil (Died) Through L.Rs. 2-A Radhabai W/o Krushna Patil Age: 60 years, Occu: Nil 2-B Vijay S/o Krushna Patil Age: 37 years, Occu: Agri 12 of 21 (( 13 )) 903(1) FA NO. 3205 OF 2008++ 2-C Sanjay S/o Krushna Patil Age: 32 years, Occu: Service All R/o Brahmanpuri, Tq. Shahada Dist. Nandurbar ….APPELLANTS VERSUS 1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer Medium Project, Dhule Tq. & Dist. Dhule 2. The State Of Maharashtra Through Colletor, Dhule, Tq. & Dist. Dhule (Now District Nandurbar) 3. The Executive Engineer, Nimna Tapi Pathbandhare Vibhag, Nandurbar Tq & Dist. Nandurbar ….RESPONDENTS WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 3206 OF 2008 Limbaji Chhagan Patil Age: 55 yearsm Occu: Farmer R/o Brahmanpuri, Tq. Shahada Dist. Nandurbar ….APPELLANT VERSUS 1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer Medium Project, Dhule Tq. & Dist. Dhule 2. The State Of Maharashtra Through Colletor, Dhule, Tq. & Dist. Dhule (Now District Nandurbar) 13 of 21 (( 14 )) 903(1) FA NO. 3205 OF 2008++ 3. The Executive Engineer, Nimna Tapi Pathbandhare Vibhag, Nandurbar Tq & Dist. Nandurbar ….RESPONDENTS WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 3208 OF 2008 Jadhav Mangalu Patil Age: 72 years, Occu: Farmer R/o Bramhanpuri, Tq. Shahada Dist. Nandurbar Through Power of Attorney Holder Mohan S/o Jadhav Patil, Age: 45 years, Occu: Agri R/o As above. ….APPELLANT VERSUS 1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer Medium Project, Dhule Tq. & Dist. Dhule 2. The State Of Maharashtra Through Colletor, Dhule, Tq. & Dist. Dhule (Now District Nandurbar) 3. The Executive Engineer, Nimna Tapi Pathbandhare Vibhag, Nandurbar Tq & Dist. Nandurbar ….RESPONDENTS WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 3455 OF 2008 Ramdas Vithal Patel Age: 52 Years, Occu: Farmer R/o Bramhanpuri Tq. Shahada Dist. Nandurbar ...APPELLANT VERSUS 1. The Special Land Acquisition Officer Medium Project, Dhule Tq. & Dist. Dhule 14 of 21 (( 15 )) 903(1) FA NO. 3205 OF 2008++ 2. The State Of Maharashtra Through Colletor, Dhule, Tq. & Dist. Dhule (Now District Nandurbar) 3. The Executive Engineer, Nimna Tapi Pathbandhare Vibhag, Nandurbar Tq & Dist. Nandurbar ….RESPONDENTS …. Mr. Dhananjay A. Naik h/for Mr. S. V. Bhosale, Advocate for Appellants / petitioners in all matters Mr. A. A. A. Khan, AGP for Respondents/State Mr. Subhash Chillarge, Advocate for Respondent No.3 in all matters …. CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 28.11.2025 ORAL JUDGMENT :- 1. All these appeals arise out of the acquisition of agricultural lands from different villages which are adjacent to each other. 2. Learned advocate for the appellants pointed out the following lands, along with their details, which were acquired for the project of Minor Irrigation Tank Susari, situated in the villages viz Bramhanpuri, Navalpur, Chandsaili, Mohide-Tarfe-Haveli and Godipur, Tahsil and District Nandurbar, as under: Sr. No. F. A. No. L.A.R. No. Name of Claimants Block No. Acquired Area S.L.A.O. Award Rs. Reference Court Awarded Rs. 01 3205/2008 32/2000 Hari Deochand Marathe 23 04 H 42 R. 12 R. Barren 56,000/- per Hector for BG. For 1,15,000/- Per Hector by 15 of 21 (( 16 )) 903(1) FA NO. 3205 OF 2008++ barren not awarded amount considered as 02 13/2010 19/200 Madhukar Gorakh Patil 103/ 3 01 H 15R PK 09 R 53,000/- Per hector 1,75,000/- per Hector 03 2768/2010 14/2000 Nagin Murar Patil 92/1 (P) 02 H. 15 R. 53,000/- per Hector for BG 1,75,000/- per Hector 04 2769/2010 13/2000 Bansi Ghanshyam Patil (Died) Through L.R. Ravindra & Ors. 91/P 00 H 97 R 56,000/- per Hector 1,75,000/- per Hector 05 3206/2008 26/2000 Limbaji Chhagan Patil 9/ (p) 02 H. 23 R. PK 08 R 56,000/- per Hector 1,75,000/- per Hector. 06 3208/2008 24/2000 Jadhav Mangalu Patil 41/2 01 H 62 R 53,000/- per Hector 1,75,000/- per Hector 07 3209/2000 30/2000 Chhabibai Dashrath Patil 118 03 H 92 R 56,000/- Per Hector 1,50,000/- per Hector 08 3455/2008 05/2000 Ramdas Vitthal Patel 11 00 H 13 R 56,000/- Per Hector 1,75,000/- per Hector 09 3540/2008 09/2000 Bhikubai Shripat Patil 37/1 +3 04 H 12 R 45 R PK 56,000/- Per Hector 2,10,000/- per Hector as Bagayat. 10 4186/2008 33/2000 Lilabai Hilal Marathe 12/P 00 H 18 R 56,000/- Per Hector 2,00,000/- Per Hector 11 4187/2008 22/2000 Ramesh Datthu Patil 13/P 00 H. 31 R 56,000/- Per Hector 2,10,000/- per Hector 12 4188/2008 8/2000 Chhagan Tarachand Marathe 31/P 00 H 54 R 59,000/- Per Hector 1,50,000/- per Hector 13 4189/2008 15/2000 Prabhakar Chotulal Vispute 29 36 01 H 52 R 08 R Pk 02 H 09 R 15 R Pk 53,000/- per Hector 65,000/- per Hector 2,10,000/- per Hector 2,10,000/- per Hector 14 4190/2008 25/2000 Sudam Sadu patil 27/P 01 H 47R 14 R PK 56,000/- Per Hector 1,75,000/- per Hector 15 4193/2008 06/2000 Dashrath Nathu Patil 28/2 /P 00 H 52 R 65,000/- Per Hector 1,35,000/- Per Hector 16 823/2007 05/2005 Sudam Sajan Patil 150 (P) 01 H 40 R 65,000/- Per Hector 75,500/- per Hector 16 of 21 (( 17 )) 903(1) FA NO. 3205 OF 2008++ 17 X. Obj.No.32/ 2023 IN FA/1451/20 07 20/2000 Uddhav Gorakh Patil 101/ 2 01 H 15 R PK 05 R 53,000/- per Hector for BG 1,15,000/- Per Hector 18 X.Obj.No.33 /2023 IN FA/125/200 8 07/2000 Ramesh Shripat Patil 37/2 01 H 14 R 56,000/- Per Hector 1,87,500/- Per Hector 19 X.Obj.No 34/2023 IN FA/80/2008 22/2000 Bula Gorakh Patil 101/ 1/P 01 H. 15 R. 15 R. PK 53,000/- Per Hector 1,75,000/- Per Hector 20 X.Obj.No 35/2023 IN FA/2917/20 08 27/2000 Devkabai Bhatu Marathe 31 02 H 65 R PK 04 R 59,000/- per Hector. 2,00,000/- per Hector. 3. Learned advocate for the appellants / claimants submitted that the lands of the claimants were irrigated and had pipeline facilities. However, the learned Reference Court did not consider this aspect in its proper perspective and awarded a meager amount of compensation by holding that, in some matters, the lands of the claimants were irrigated and semi-irrigated. The amount of compensation was not properly determined considering the evidence adduced by the claimants, particularly the sale instances were not properly appreciated. He submitted that the reasons and findings recorded by the learned Reference Court are neither legal nor correct, either on facts or in law. He further pointed out the judgment of this Court delivered in First Appeal No.133 of 2007 and other connected matters dated 25.01.2021, wherein compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- 17 of 21 (( 18 )) 903(1) FA NO. 3205 OF 2008++ per hectare was awarded for irrigated land. He therefore submitted that the principle of parity be applied while awarding compensation to the claimants lands in the present appeals, as well as in the cross- objections filed by them in the other four appeals, which were withdrawn in view of the Circular of the State Government authorizing the learned AGP to withdraw appeals where the compensation awarded is not more than four times. Learned advocate for the claimants lastly prayed to allow the appeals as well as the Cross-Objections. 4. Learned AGP for the State and Learned advocate for respondent No.3 strongly opposed the appeals and cross-objections and submitted that there is no substance in the grounds of objections raised by the claimants. They submitted that the entire evidence was properly appreciated by the learned Reference Court and calculated the amount of compensation based on the evidence. They therefore submitted that no interference is warranted in the impugned judgments and awards and lastly prayed to dismiss the appeals and Cross-Objections. 5. Perused the impugned judgments and awards as well as the record and proceedings, along with the judgment relied upon by the 18 of 21 (( 19 )) 903(1) FA NO. 3205 OF 2008++ learned advocate for the appellants/claimants, delivered on 25.01.2021 in First Appeal No.133 of 2007. On perusal of the entire documentary evidence, particularly the 7/12 extracts and the oral and documentary evidence, it appears that except for the barren land shown in the table, the claimants’ lands are similarly situated. The lands in the vicinity are of the same quality and have the facility of a pipeline. This shows that the lands in question, which were acquired for one and the same project, are required to be compensated on the basis of the judgment delivered on 25.01.2021 in First Appeal No.133 of 2007 and other connected matters. 6. As regards to the First Appeal Nos.3540 of 2008, 4186 of 2008, 4187 of 2008, 4189 of 2008 and Cross-Objection No.35 of 2023 in FA/2917/2008, the learned Reference Court has already awarded compensation @ Rs.2,10,000/-, Rs.2,00,000/-, Rs.2,10,000/-, Rs.2,10,000/- and Rs.2,00,000/- per hectare respectively. Hence, the said appeals and Cross-Objection deserve to be dismissed. 7. Considering all these aspects and on the principle of parity, the cross-objections and the First Appeals excluding First Appeal Nos.3540 of 2008, 4186 of 2008, 4187 of 2008, 4189 of 2008 and 19 of 21 (( 20 )) 903(1) FA NO. 3205 OF 2008++ Cross-Objection No.35 of 2023 in FA/2917/2008, deserve to be partly allowed, and the impugned judgments and awards deserve to be partly set aside. Hence, the following order: :: ORDER :: a. The First Appeals except First Appeal Nos.3540 of 2008, 4186 of 2008, 4187 of 2008, 4189 of 2008 are partly allowed. The Cross-Objections except Cross-Objection No.35 of 2023 in FA/2917/2008, are partly allowed. b. The impugned judgments and awards are partly set aside and modified as under: c. The compensation awarded by the learned Reference Court is enhanced to Rs. 2,00,000/- per hectare for irrigated lands of the claimants in all the claim petitions along with statutory benefits. d. The claimants are entitled to compensation @ Rs. 50,000/- per hectare for their barren lands, along with statutory benefits including interest, etc., as per the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act. e. The First Appeal Nos.3540 of 2008, 4186 of 2008, 4187 of 2008, 4189 of 2008 and Cross-Objection No.35 of 2023 in FA/2917/2008 are dismissed. f. It is clarified that the claimants shall not be entitled to interest for the period of delay, if such delay is condoned by this Court. 20 of 21 (( 21 )) 903(1) FA NO. 3205 OF 2008++ g. The Acquiring Authority is directed to deposit the amount of enhanced compensation within 12 weeks, along with interest and other benefits accrued thereon. h. Pending Civil Applications, if any, stand disposed of. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] HRJadhav 21 of 21